Composite Geomembrane Technology for Seepage Control in Hydraulic Engineering: A Comprehensive Technical Manual for Engineering Professionals

1. Introduction

1.1 Technical Background and Development Overview

Composite geomembranes represent a revolutionary advancement in hydraulic engineering seepage control technology. These engineered materials consist of synthetic membranes combined with geotextiles, creating a highly effective barrier against water seepage while providing structural reinforcement (1). The global application of composite geomembranes in hydraulic structures has grown significantly over the past few decades, driven by their superior performance characteristics and adaptability to diverse geological and climatic conditions (13).

In Europe, the development and application of geomembranes in dam construction pioneered worldwide practices. The first recorded geomembrane installations globally were in 1959 at the Contrada Sabetta rockfill dam in Italy and in 1960 at the Dobsina earthfill dam in Slovakia (13). Until the early 1980s, nearly all geomembrane applications on dams were concentrated in Europe, with only two exceptions: the Terzaghi rockfill dam in Canada and Atbashinsk rockfill dam in Kyrgyzstan (13). This European leadership in geomembrane technology has continued to influence global practices, with European design principles and innovations forming the foundation for most geomembrane projects implemented worldwide today (13).

The technological evolution of composite geomembranes has been marked by continuous improvement in material science, manufacturing processes, and application techniques. Modern composite geomembranes are engineered to provide enhanced durability, flexibility, and strength, making them increasingly preferred over traditional rigid liners such as concrete or bituminous concrete in many hydraulic engineering applications (1). This technological progression has been supported by the development of specialized standards and testing methodologies that ensure the quality and performance of composite geomembrane systems (57).

1.2 Advantages and Application Value

Composite geomembrane technology offers several distinct advantages over conventional seepage control methods, making it a preferred choice for modern hydraulic engineering projects:

Superior Seepage Control Performance: Composite geomembranes exhibit extremely low permeability, with properly manufactured HDPE geomembranes achieving permeability coefficients of 10⁻¹⁴ m/s or lower (58). This near-impermeability makes them highly effective in preventing water loss and controlling seepage in various hydraulic structures.

Excellent Deformation Adaptability: Unlike rigid liners, composite geomembranes possess high flexibility and plasticity, allowing them to adapt to soil deformations and geological changes without compromising their integrity (29). This characteristic is particularly valuable in areas prone to seismic activity, differential settlement, or frequent water level fluctuations (1).

Efficient and Convenient Construction: Composite geomembranes are lightweight, flexible, and easy to handle, facilitating rapid installation even in complex terrain. Their modular nature allows for efficient large-scale deployment, significantly reducing construction time compared to traditional methods (1).

Cost-Effectiveness: The material and construction costs for composite geomembrane systems typically range between 30% to 50% of those for equivalent concrete systems (51). This cost advantage, combined with reduced maintenance requirements, results in substantial long-term savings for hydraulic projects (1).

Environmental Benefits: Composite geomembranes contribute to sustainable construction practices by reducing the carbon footprint associated with cement production. Additionally, many modern geomembrane materials are recyclable, aligning with contemporary environmental protection principles (51).

Composite geomembranes have found extensive application across various hydraulic engineering contexts, including:

Reservoirs and dams of various types
Canal lining and rehabilitation projects
Levee and embankment seepage control
Artificial lakes and water storage facilities
Hydropower station water conveyance systems
Mine tailings impoundments and industrial containment systems (69)

Their versatility allows them to be used in both new construction projects and rehabilitation of existing structures, addressing a wide range of seepage control challenges .

1.3 Objectives and Structure of This Technical Manual

This technical manual aims to provide engineering professionals with a comprehensive understanding of composite geomembrane technology for seepage control in hydraulic engineering. The document is designed to serve as a practical reference for engineers involved in the design, specification, installation, and quality control of composite geomembrane systems in various hydraulic applications.

The manual focuses on providing:

A thorough understanding of composite geomembrane materials, their composition, classification, and performance characteristics
Design principles and structural considerations for different types of hydraulic structures
Detailed guidance on installation procedures and quality control measures
Analysis of international case studies demonstrating successful implementation
Comparative evaluation of composite geomembrane technology against alternative seepage control methods
Summary of relevant international standards and regulatory requirements

The content is structured to guide the reader through the entire lifecycle of composite geomembrane applications in hydraulic engineering, from initial material selection to final installation and system commissioning. By following this comprehensive approach, the manual aims to equip engineering professionals with the knowledge and tools necessary to make informed decisions regarding the implementation of composite geomembrane systems in their projects.

2. Composite Geomembrane Materials and Classification

2.1 Basic Material Composition and Structural Forms

Composite geomembranes are engineered materials composed of synthetic polymer membranes combined with geotextiles through various manufacturing processes. The fundamental structure typically consists of one or more layers of geomembrane laminated or bonded to one or more layers of geotextile, creating a composite material with enhanced performance characteristics compared to single-layer systems (19).

The core components of composite geomembranes include:

Geomembrane Layer: The impermeable component of the composite system, typically made from high-density polyethylene (HDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), or other specialized polymer materials (69). These materials are selected for their low permeability, chemical resistance, and mechanical properties. HDPE is particularly popular in hydraulic applications due to its excellent impermeability, high tensile strength, and resistance to environmental stress cracking (58).

Geotextile Layers: The reinforcing component, typically constructed from non-woven or woven geotextiles made of polyester or polypropylene fibers. These layers provide mechanical reinforcement to the geomembrane, enhancing its tensile strength, puncture resistance, and tear resistance (17). The geotextile also serves as a protective layer, shielding the geomembrane from damage during installation and service (19).

The manufacturing process for composite geomembranes typically involves heating one or both sides of the geomembrane through a far-infrared oven and then pressing the geotextile and geomembrane together using guide rollers to form the composite structure (17). This thermal bonding process ensures strong adhesion between the geomembrane and geotextiles while maintaining the flexibility and impermeability of the membrane (18).

Composite geomembranes are available in several structural configurations, including:

Single Geotextile-Single Membrane (One Cloth One Film): Consists of a single layer of geotextile bonded to one side of the geomembrane. This configuration is typically used in applications where moderate reinforcement and protection are required (17).
Double Geotextile-Single Membrane (Two Cloths One Film): Features geotextile layers bonded to both sides of the geomembrane. This configuration provides superior mechanical properties and protection, making it suitable for demanding applications (17).
Single Geotextile-Double Membrane (One Cloth Two Films): Incorporates two layers of geomembrane with a single layer of geotextile between them. This configuration offers enhanced redundancy and impermeability (17).
Multiple Geotextile-Multiple Membrane (Multiple Cloths Multiple Films): Comprises alternating layers of geotextile and geomembrane, providing maximum strength and protection for specialized high-performance applications (19).

The choice of structural configuration depends on factors such as the specific application requirements, expected environmental conditions, installation methods, and budget constraints.

2.2 Performance Specifications and Technical Requirements

Composite geomembranes are engineered to meet specific performance criteria that ensure their effectiveness and durability in hydraulic applications. These performance specifications are typically defined by international standards and industry guidelines, which establish minimum requirements for key material properties (57).

The primary performance specifications for composite geomembranes include:

Physical Properties:

Thickness: The thickness of the geomembrane component is a critical parameter affecting permeability and mechanical performance. Standard thicknesses range from 0.2mm to 5.0mm, with typical hydraulic applications using membranes between 0.5mm and 2.0mm in thickness (69).
Unit Area Mass: This refers to the mass of the composite material per unit area, typically measured in grams per square meter (g/m²). Unit area mass is an important indicator of material quality and consistency (19).
Density: The density of the geomembrane material, typically measured in grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm³). For HDPE geomembranes, the minimum density is usually specified as 0.940 g/cm³ or higher (71).

Mechanical Properties:

Tensile Strength: The maximum force per unit width that the material can withstand before breaking, typically measured in kilonewtons per meter (kN/m) or megapascals (MPa). Composite geomembranes exhibit tensile strengths ranging from 8 kN/m to over 37 kN/m, depending on the material composition and structural configuration (71).
Elongation at Break: The percentage elongation that the material undergoes before breaking. High-quality composite geomembranes typically exhibit elongation at break values of 400% to 700% or more, indicating excellent flexibility and deformation capacity (71).
Tear Resistance: The material's ability to resist tearing, typically measured in newtons (N). Values for composite geomembranes range from 64 N to over 311 N, depending on the material and construction (71).
Puncture Resistance: The force required to puncture the material, measured in newtons (N). Composite geomembranes typically exhibit puncture resistance values ranging from 160 N to 800 N or higher (71).
CBR (California Bearing Ratio) Burst Strength: A measure of the material's resistance to sudden impact or localized pressure, typically ranging from 1.1 kN to 3.2 kN for different composite configurations (61).

Durability and Environmental Resistance:

Oxidation Induction Time (OIT): A measure of the material's resistance to thermal oxidation, typically specified as a minimum value in minutes. For HDPE geomembranes, OIT values of at least 100 minutes (standard test) or 400 minutes (high-pressure test) are commonly required (71).
Resistance to Environmental Stress Cracking (ESC): The material's ability to resist cracking under combined tensile stress and chemical exposure. HDPE geomembranes are typically required to withstand at least 500 hours of exposure under specified conditions without cracking (71).
UV Resistance: The ability to maintain performance characteristics when exposed to ultraviolet radiation. This is particularly important for applications where the geomembrane may be temporarily or permanently exposed (57).
Temperature Resistance: The range of temperatures within which the material maintains its functional properties. High-quality composite geomembranes typically perform effectively across a temperature range of -70°C to +110°C (71).

Permeability and Seepage Control:

Permeability Coefficient: A measure of the material's resistance to water flow, typically expressed in meters per second (m/s). High-quality HDPE geomembranes achieve permeability coefficients of 10⁻¹⁴ m/s or lower, making them virtually impermeable (58).
Hydrostatic Pressure Resistance: The maximum water pressure that the material can withstand without leakage, typically specified in megapascals (MPa) (61).

These performance specifications are critical for ensuring the suitability of composite geomembranes for specific hydraulic applications. Engineers must carefully evaluate these properties when selecting materials for their projects, ensuring that the chosen product meets or exceeds the requirements of the intended application.

2.3 Product Classification and Specification Systems

Composite geomembranes are classified according to various criteria, including material composition, structural configuration, application requirements, and performance characteristics. This classification system helps engineers select the most appropriate product for their specific project needs (69).

Based on material composition, composite geomembranes can be classified into several primary categories:

HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene) Composite Geomembranes: These are among the most widely used in hydraulic engineering due to their excellent impermeability, high tensile strength, resistance to environmental stress cracking, and chemical resistance (58). HDPE geomembranes are available in smooth or textured surface finishes, with textured surfaces providing enhanced friction characteristics for certain applications (73).
LLDPE (Linear Low-Density Polyethylene) Composite Geomembranes: Offer higher elongation and flexibility compared to HDPE, making them suitable for applications where greater deformation capacity is required (73).
PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) Composite Geomembranes: Provide good mechanical properties and chemical resistance. PVC geomembranes can be reinforced with synthetic fibers to enhance their durability and performance in challenging environments (4).
EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate) Composite Geomembranes: Feature excellent flexibility and low-temperature performance, making them suitable for cold climate applications (69).
CSPE (Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene) Composite Geomembranes: Offer exceptional resistance to UV radiation, ozone, and chemical exposure, making them suitable for specialized applications (69).

In terms of structural configuration, composite geomembranes are typically classified based on the number and arrangement of geotextile and membrane layers:

Single Geotextile-Single Membrane (One Cloth One Film): Provides moderate reinforcement and protection for the geomembrane. The weight of the base geotextile typically ranges from 80 g/m² to 600 g/m², with geomembrane thicknesses between 0.2mm and 1.5mm (61).
Double Geotextile-Single Membrane (Two Cloths One Film): Offers superior mechanical properties and protection. This configuration is commonly used in demanding applications where higher tensile strength, puncture resistance, and tear resistance are required (61).
Single Geotextile-Double Membrane (One Cloth Two Films): Provides enhanced redundancy and impermeability, making it suitable for applications where a higher level of seepage control is required (17).
Multiple Geotextile-Multiple Membrane (Multiple Cloths Multiple Films): Offers the highest level of mechanical performance and protection, typically used in specialized high-performance applications (19).

Composite geomembranes are also classified according to their application-specific performance requirements. For example, geomembranes intended for hydraulic applications must meet specific criteria related to water tightness, UV resistance, and resistance to biological degradation (71).

The specification of composite geomembranes typically includes the following parameters:

Thickness: Specified in millimeters (mm), with common thicknesses ranging from 0.2mm to 5.0mm. The selection of thickness depends on factors such as design water pressure, foundation conditions, and expected service life (71).
Width: The standard width of the roll, typically ranging from 1m to 8m. Wider rolls reduce the number of seams required during installation, which can improve installation efficiency and reduce potential leak points (69).
Roll Length: The standard length of the roll, typically ranging from 50m to 100m. Longer rolls minimize waste and reduce the number of field seams (69).
Color: The standard color for most composite geomembranes is black, although other colors may be available for specific applications. Black geomembranes typically contain carbon black (2.0% to 3.0%) which provides UV protection and enhances durability (71).
Surface Texture: Composite geomembranes are available with smooth or textured surfaces. Textured surfaces provide increased friction, which can be beneficial in certain applications where slip resistance is important (73).

Composite geomembranes are typically manufactured in accordance with international standards such as ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) and EN (European Norms) specifications. For example, HDPE geomembranes are often manufactured to meet ASTM D6751 standards for biodiesel fuel blend stock, which specifies requirements for materials used in fuel storage and conveyance systems (44).

When specifying composite geomembranes for hydraulic applications, engineers should consider factors such as the specific application requirements, expected environmental conditions, installation methods, and budget constraints. By carefully evaluating these factors and selecting the appropriate composite geomembrane product, engineers can ensure optimal performance and longevity of the seepage control system.

3. Structural Design Principles for Composite Geomembrane Systems

3.1 Basic Structural Components and Design Principles

Composite geomembrane seepage control systems are typically composed of multiple layers that work together to provide effective and durable seepage control. The basic structural components of a typical composite geomembrane system include:

Support Layer: The lowest layer of the system, which provides a stable foundation for the overlying components. The support layer is typically constructed from compacted soil, gravel, or other suitable materials that can distribute loads evenly and provide adequate drainage (1).
Protection Layer: Placed directly above the support layer, this component protects the geomembrane from damage caused by sharp objects or uneven surfaces in the support layer. The protection layer can be constructed from sand, fine gravel, geotextile, or other suitable materials (1).
Composite Geomembrane: The core component of the system, which provides the primary seepage control function. The geomembrane is typically placed above the protection layer, with its orientation depending on the specific application (1).
Secondary Protection Layer: In some cases, a secondary protection layer may be placed above the geomembrane to provide additional protection from mechanical damage, UV radiation, or other environmental factors (1).
Ballast or Cover Layer: The uppermost layer of the system, which serves to protect the geomembrane from external forces, maintain its position, and provide additional stability. The ballast layer can be constructed from soil, gravel, concrete slabs, or other suitable materials (1).

The design of composite geomembrane systems should follow several fundamental principles to ensure optimal performance and longevity:

Seepage Control Reliability: The primary objective of the design is to ensure reliable seepage control. This requires selecting appropriate materials, designing adequate overlap and connection details, and ensuring proper installation techniques (1).

Structural Stability: The system must be designed to maintain its integrity under anticipated loads and environmental conditions. This includes consideration of factors such as soil pressures, water pressures, thermal expansion and contraction, and potential settlement (1).

Deformation Adaptability: Given the dynamic nature of many hydraulic structures, the design should account for potential deformations due to settlement, seismic activity, or thermal effects. Composite geomembranes' inherent flexibility makes them well-suited to accommodate such deformations when properly designed (29).

Constructability: The design should consider the practical aspects of construction, including site access, equipment availability, weather conditions, and the skills of the construction team. This ensures that the design can be implemented as intended (1).

Cost-Effectiveness: The design should balance performance requirements with economic considerations, selecting materials and configurations that provide the best value for the project budget (51).

Environmental Sustainability: Modern designs should incorporate environmentally sustainable principles, including the use of recyclable materials, reduced carbon footprint, and consideration of long-term environmental impacts (51).

When designing composite geomembrane systems, engineers must consider several key factors that influence system performance:

Hydrostatic Pressure: The maximum water pressure that the system will be required to withstand. This directly affects the required thickness and strength of the geomembrane (71).
Soil Conditions: The properties of the foundation soil, including its composition, density, and potential for settlement or deformation (1).
Temperature Extremes: The range of temperatures expected at the site, which can affect material selection and installation methods (71).
Chemical Environment: The presence of any chemicals in the water or soil that could potentially affect the performance of the geomembrane material (58).
UV Exposure: The degree of exposure to sunlight, which can affect material selection and the need for protective cover layers (57).
Expected Service Life: The desired lifespan of the seepage control system, which influences material selection and design considerations (1).

By carefully considering these factors and following sound design principles, engineers can develop composite geomembrane systems that provide reliable, long-lasting seepage control for a wide range of hydraulic engineering applications.

3.2 Design Considerations for Different Hydraulic Structures

Composite geomembrane systems can be applied in various hydraulic structures, each with its own unique design considerations. The following section provides an overview of design considerations for several common hydraulic applications (1).

Reservoir and Dam Applications:

Reservoirs and dams represent major applications for composite geomembrane systems. The design considerations for these structures include:

Slope Stability: The design must ensure that the geomembrane system remains stable on the dam slopes, particularly during periods of water level fluctuation. This may involve special anchoring systems and consideration of friction coefficients between layers (1).
Anchorage Systems: Effective anchorage is critical to prevent the geomembrane from being displaced by water pressure or wave action. Anchorage systems typically involve trenches, concrete blocks, or other mechanical fastening methods (1).
Joint Design: Special attention must be given to the design of joints between geomembrane panels, particularly at transitions between horizontal and vertical surfaces (1).
Underdrainage Systems: In some cases, underdrainage systems may be necessary to relieve any hydrostatic pressure that may develop beneath the geomembrane (1).
Wave Protection: For exposed surfaces, the design may need to incorporate measures to protect the geomembrane from wave action and floating debris (1).

The 18 Water Saving Basins of the Third Set of Locks of the Panama Canal expansion project provides an excellent example of composite geomembrane application in a reservoir-like environment. These basins experience an average of 5 to 6 fill/empty cycles per day, requiring robust geomembrane systems with specialized anchorage systems to maintain stability under these dynamic conditions (1).

Canal Lining Applications:

Canals present unique design challenges due to their linear nature and varying cross-sections. Key design considerations for canal applications include:

Flow Velocity: The design must account for the velocity of water flowing through the canal, which affects the choice of geomembrane material and protective layers .
Bed and Bank Stability: The geomembrane system must be designed to prevent erosion and maintain stability of the canal bed and banks .
Temperature Effects: Canals often experience significant temperature variations, which can cause expansion and contraction of the geomembrane. The design must accommodate these thermal effects .
Freeze-Thaw Cycles: In cold climates, the design must consider the effects of freeze-thaw cycles on the geomembrane and underlying soil .
Sedimentation and Scour: The design should account for potential sedimentation and scour issues, which can affect the performance of the geomembrane system .

The rehabilitation of aging concrete or bituminous concrete canal linings represents a significant application for composite geomembranes. These systems not only restore watertightness but can also improve flow characteristics, increasing water conveyance efficiency .

Levee and Embankment Applications:

Levees and embankments require seepage control systems that can accommodate potential settlement and differential movement. Key design considerations include:

Settlement Accommodation: The design must account for potential settlement of the embankment, which can cause stresses in the geomembrane system (1).
Seepage Control: Effective control of seepage through the embankment is critical to maintain stability and prevent internal erosion (1).
Erosion Protection: The design must include measures to protect the geomembrane from wave action and surface erosion (1).
Vegetation Management: Consideration should be given to the potential for vegetation growth on the embankment, which can affect the performance of the geomembrane system (1).

A notable example of composite geomembrane application in a levee system is the rehabilitation of the Brandbach dam in southern Germany. After more than 75 years of operation, the concrete lining of this 16m-high dam needed to be sealed. The solution involved the installation of a drained geomembrane system, representing the first application of this technique in Germany (7).

Underwater and Wet Environment Applications:

In some cases, composite geomembrane systems need to be installed underwater or in wet environments. These applications present unique design challenges, including:

Waterproof Connection Systems: Specialized connection methods are required to ensure watertight seals when installing geomembranes underwater .
Weighting Systems: The design must ensure that the geomembrane remains in place underwater, which may involve the use of weighting systems or ballast materials .
Visibility and Access: Limited visibility and access in underwater environments require special consideration in the design, including the use of remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) for inspection and installation .

An innovative development in this area is the SIBELONMAT® system, which allows for the repair of canals underwater without impacting operations. This system uses panels of double geomembrane mattress filled with mortar, joined with watertight devices. It has already been successfully installed underwater in two pilot projects in water supply canals, maintaining water flow without reduction .

Landfill and Containment Applications:

While not strictly hydraulic structures, landfills and industrial containment systems represent important applications for composite geomembranes. Design considerations for these applications include:

Chemical Resistance: The geomembrane must be resistant to the specific chemicals present in the waste or stored liquids (10).
Leachate Collection Systems: The design must incorporate effective leachate collection and removal systems (10).
Gas Venting: In some cases, provisions for gas venting may be necessary to prevent the buildup of gases beneath the geomembrane (10).
Protection Layers: Heavy-duty protection layers may be required to prevent damage from sharp objects in the waste (10).

A notable case study in this area involves two mine sites where geosynthetics were used for seepage control. In Chile, a geomembrane was used to line the face of a tailings impoundment rock-filled dam to control seepage. In Colorado, a Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) was used to cap historical tailings. In both cases, full-scale test pads were constructed to evaluate performance under actual conditions before full-scale implementation (10).

By carefully considering the specific requirements of each hydraulic structure type and applying appropriate design principles, engineers can develop composite geomembrane systems that provide reliable, long-lasting seepage control solutions.

3.3 Connection and Anchorage Systems Design

The successful performance of composite geomembrane systems in hydraulic engineering applications depends significantly on the design of effective connection and anchorage systems. These systems ensure that individual geomembrane panels are joined together securely and that the entire system is anchored properly to the surrounding structures (1).

Connection Systems Design:

Connections between geomembrane panels are critical points in any seepage control system, as they represent potential weak spots for leakage. The design of connection systems must ensure watertight seals that maintain their integrity over the service life of the system (1).

There are several methods for connecting composite geomembranes, each with its own advantages and considerations:

Heat Welding: This is the most common method for joining thermoplastic geomembranes such as HDPE, LLDPE, and PVC. Heat welding involves heating the surfaces of the geomembranes to their melting point and then pressing them together to form a continuous bond. This method can be performed using various types of equipment, including extrusion welders, hot wedge welders, and hot air welders (1).
Chemical Adhesives: Used for certain materials like PVC, chemical adhesives create strong bonds between geomembrane panels. The surfaces to be joined are typically roughened and cleaned before applying the adhesive, which is then allowed to cure according to manufacturer specifications (1).
Mechanical Fasteners: In some cases, especially for temporary installations or repairs, mechanical fasteners such as staples, clips, or straps may be used. These methods are generally less reliable than heat welding or chemical bonding and are typically used in conjunction with sealing materials (1).

The design of connection systems must consider several factors:

Joint Efficiency: The connection should ideally achieve at least 80% of the strength of the parent material to ensure overall system integrity (1).
Waterproofing Effectiveness: The connection must form a watertight seal that prevents any seepage through the joint (1).
Temperature Sensitivity: The performance of connections can be affected by temperature variations, which should be considered in the design (1).
Installation Conditions: The design should consider the practical aspects of making connections under actual field conditions, including weather limitations and access constraints (1).

The connection between the geomembrane and other structures, such as concrete walls, steel structures, or existing linings, presents additional design challenges. These connections typically involve specialized transition details that ensure a watertight seal while accommodating any differential movement between the structures (1).

Anchorage Systems Design:

Anchorage systems are essential for preventing the displacement of composite geomembrane systems due to water pressure, wave action, thermal expansion, or other forces. The design of anchorage systems must ensure that the geomembrane remains securely in place throughout its service life (1).

Common types of anchorage systems include:

Trench Anchorage: Involves excavating a trench along the perimeter of the geomembrane installation, placing the geomembrane into the trench, and backfilling it with compacted soil or concrete. This is one of the most reliable and commonly used anchorage methods (1).
Concrete Block Anchorage: Uses concrete blocks placed at intervals along the perimeter or at specific intervals to secure the geomembrane. This method is often used in conjunction with other anchorage techniques (1).
Mechanical Fastener Anchorage: Employs specialized mechanical fasteners, such as metal strips and bolts, to secure the geomembrane to the underlying structure. This method is typically used in conjunction with sealing materials to ensure watertightness (1).
Combination Anchorage: Many projects use a combination of anchorage methods to provide maximum security, especially in critical applications (1).

The design of anchorage systems must consider several factors:

Anchorage Force Requirements: The system must be capable of resisting the maximum anticipated forces, which can be calculated based on hydrostatic pressure, wind uplift, and other relevant factors (1).
Compatibility with Surrounding Materials: The anchorage system must be compatible with both the geomembrane material and the underlying structure (1).
Maintenance Access: The design should allow for inspection and potential maintenance of the anchorage points without compromising system integrity (1).
Aesthetic Considerations: In some applications, particularly in urban or recreational settings, the appearance of the anchorage system may be a consideration (1).

Recent developments in anchorage system design include innovative approaches for exposed geomembrane systems. At the Kokhav Hayarden pumped storage project in Israel, completed in 2022, the anchorage system consists of heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands embedded in vertical trenches. This design allows the system to accept large settlements and differential displacements while maintaining its integrity (1).

Similarly, at the Abdelmoumen pumped storage project in Morocco, completed in 2023, the concept of heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands was maintained, with specific construction methods defined to conform to different embankment materials and subgrade preparation. The liner used in this project is a lacquered geomembrane, intended to enhance durability in an environment with particularly high UV radiation (1).

The connection between composite geomembranes and concrete structures represents a critical detail in many hydraulic projects. In the case of the Llangollen canal in North Wales, UK, the ability to bond the bituminous geomembrane directly to concrete was a key factor in its selection. This allowed for a simpler design compared to other commonly used systems, despite the added complexities of constructing a new concrete retaining wall along one bank and creating water access points for livestock (12).

By carefully designing both connection and anchorage systems to meet the specific requirements of each project, engineers can ensure that composite geomembrane systems perform reliably and effectively throughout their service life.

4. Construction Technology and Quality Control

4.1 Pre-construction Preparations

Successful implementation of composite geomembrane systems requires thorough preparation before actual installation begins. These pre-construction preparations are critical to ensuring that the project proceeds smoothly and meets the required performance standards (22).

Technical Documentation Review:

Before any construction activities commence, the project team should conduct a comprehensive review of all technical documentation, including:

Design Drawings and Specifications: These documents provide detailed information about the project requirements, including geomembrane type and specifications, installation details, and quality standards (22).
Site Investigation Reports: Reviewing geological and geotechnical reports helps identify potential challenges related to soil conditions, groundwater levels, and other site-specific factors that may affect the installation process (22).
Environmental Impact Assessments: Understanding the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures ensures compliance with regulatory requirements and promotes sustainable construction practices (22).
Health and Safety Plans: Reviewing safety documentation helps identify potential hazards and develop appropriate risk mitigation strategies (22).

Material Procurement and Inspection:

The quality of the composite geomembrane material is fundamental to the success of the project. Key activities related to material procurement and inspection include:

Material Specification Compliance: Ensuring that the delivered geomembrane materials meet or exceed the project specifications, including physical properties, mechanical performance, and durability characteristics (57).
Product Certification Verification: Reviewing manufacturer certifications and test reports to confirm that the materials have been produced in accordance with relevant standards and specifications (57).
Physical Inspection: Conducting visual and physical inspections of the delivered materials to check for any visible defects, damage, or inconsistencies (57).
Sample Testing: In some cases, representative samples of the geomembrane material may be sent to an independent testing laboratory for verification of key performance properties (57).

It is important to note that the quality of composite geomembranes can vary significantly between manufacturers and even between different production batches from the same manufacturer. Therefore, thorough material inspection and testing are essential to ensure that the installed system meets the project's performance requirements (57).

Site Preparation:

Preparing the installation site properly is crucial for ensuring the success of the composite geomembrane system. Key site preparation activities include:

Vegetation and Debris Removal: Clearing the site of all vegetation, rocks, roots, and other debris that could potentially damage the geomembrane during installation or service (22).
Surface Grading and Compaction: Grading the surface to the specified contours and compacting the soil to achieve the required density and stability. This ensures a smooth, uniform base that minimizes the risk of punctures or tears in the geomembrane (22).
Drainage System Installation: Installing any required drainage systems, such as French drains or perforated pipes, to control groundwater and surface water during and after the geomembrane installation (22).
Access Road Construction: Creating suitable access roads to facilitate the delivery and handling of materials and equipment (22).
Weather Protection Measures: Implementing measures to protect the site from adverse weather conditions, such as temporary shelters or drainage systems to prevent water accumulation (22).

The specific site preparation requirements will vary depending on factors such as the type of hydraulic structure, soil conditions, climate, and project specifications. In some cases, specialized equipment or techniques may be required to prepare challenging sites, such as those with steep slopes, unstable soils, or high groundwater levels (22).

Equipment Preparation:

Having the right equipment in good working condition is essential for efficient and high-quality composite geomembrane installation. Key equipment considerations include:

Geomembrane Laying Equipment: Depending on the project size and complexity, this may include specialized machinery for unrolling and positioning large geomembrane sheets (22).
Welding Equipment: Ensuring that heat welding equipment is properly calibrated and maintained to achieve consistent, high-quality welds (22).
Testing Equipment: Preparing equipment for testing the integrity of welds and connections, such as vacuum boxes, pressure gauges, and electronic leak detectors (22).
Safety Equipment: Providing appropriate personal protective equipment for workers, including gloves, boots, hard hats, and fall protection systems where necessary (22).
Support Equipment: Ensuring availability of equipment for handling materials, such as forklifts, cranes, or conveyor systems, as needed (22).

Personnel Training and Safety Planning:

Investing in proper training for construction personnel and developing comprehensive safety plans are essential for a successful project:

Installation Training: Ensuring that all personnel involved in the installation process have received proper training on composite geomembrane installation techniques, including handling, welding, and quality control procedures (22).
Safety Training: Conducting thorough safety training to address site-specific hazards, safe equipment operation, and emergency procedures (22).
Job Hazard Analysis: Developing detailed job hazard analyses for each task involved in the installation process to identify potential risks and implement appropriate controls (22).
Communication Plan: Establishing clear communication channels between all team members, including supervisors, installers, and quality control personnel (22).

By completing these pre-construction preparations thoroughly, project teams can minimize risks, improve efficiency, and ensure that the composite geomembrane installation meets the highest standards of quality and performance.

4.2 Installation Techniques and Procedures

The successful installation of composite geomembranes requires careful planning and execution of specific techniques and procedures. The following section provides a detailed overview of the key steps involved in installing composite geomembrane systems in hydraulic engineering applications (22).

Geomembrane Handling and Storage:

Proper handling and storage of composite geomembranes are essential to prevent damage before installation:

Transportation Care: Ensuring that geomembrane rolls are transported on suitable vehicles with adequate support to prevent damage from vibration or shifting during transit (22).
Storage Conditions: Storing geomembrane materials in a clean, dry, shaded area away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and potential chemical exposure. Ideally, materials should be stored in their original packaging until ready for use (22).
Handling Equipment: Using appropriate lifting and handling equipment to avoid puncturing or tearing the geomembrane. This may include specialized lifting straps or cradles designed for handling large rolls (22).
Roll Inspection: Conducting a visual inspection of each roll before unrolling to identify any damage that may have occurred during transportation or storage (22).

Improper handling and storage can compromise the integrity of the geomembrane material, leading to potential leaks and reduced system performance. Therefore, strict adherence to proper handling and storage procedures is essential (22).

Base Layer Preparation:

The base layer provides the foundation for the composite geomembrane system and must be properly prepared to ensure optimal performance:

Surface Grading: Grading the base layer to the specified contours and elevations, ensuring a smooth, uniform surface. Any irregularities or depressions should be filled and compacted to prevent stress concentrations in the geomembrane (22).
Foreign Object Removal: Thoroughly inspecting and clearing the base layer of any rocks, debris, roots, or other objects that could puncture or damage the geomembrane (22).
Moisture Control: Managing moisture levels in the base layer to prevent excessive wetness or dryness, which can affect compaction and stability (22).
Compaction Verification: Ensuring that the base layer has been compacted to the specified density using appropriate compaction equipment and techniques (22).

The quality of the base layer preparation directly impacts the performance of the composite geomembrane system. A poorly prepared base can lead to geomembrane damage, reduced system lifespan, and potential seepage issues (22).

Geomembrane Unrolling and Positioning:

The process of unrolling and positioning the geomembrane requires careful planning and execution:

Roll Orientation: Determining the correct orientation of the geomembrane rolls based on the project design, taking into account factors such as slope direction, expected water flow, and seam locations (22).
Unrolling Sequence: Developing a systematic approach to unrolling the geomembrane rolls, typically starting from one end of the installation area and working toward the opposite end (22).
Tension Control: Maintaining appropriate tension on the geomembrane during unrolling to prevent excessive wrinkling or slack, while avoiding over-stretching that could damage the material (22).
Positioning Accuracy: Ensuring that the geomembrane is positioned according to the design specifications, with proper alignment and overlap at seams and edges (22).

For large-scale projects, specialized equipment such as geomembrane unrolling machines may be used to facilitate the process and improve efficiency. These machines can handle large rolls of geomembrane material and maintain consistent tension during unrolling (22).

Seaming and Welding Procedures:

The quality of seams and welds is critical to the overall performance of the composite geomembrane system. Key procedures include:

Surface Preparation: Cleaning and preparing the surfaces to be joined by removing any dirt, debris, moisture, or other contaminants that could affect the quality of the weld (22).
Welding Equipment Setup: Calibrating welding equipment to the appropriate temperature, speed, and pressure settings based on the geomembrane material and thickness (22).
Welding Technique: Applying the appropriate welding technique for the specific geomembrane material, whether hot wedge welding, hot air welding, extrusion welding, or another method (22).
Seam Inspection: Conducting visual inspections of each weld to check for uniformity, continuity, and any visible defects such as holes, burns, or incomplete fusion (22).
Quality Control Testing: Performing non-destructive testing on a sample of seams to verify their integrity. Common testing methods include vacuum box testing for flat seams and pressure testing for extrusion welds (22).

The specific welding procedures will vary depending on the type of geomembrane material being used. For example, HDPE geomembranes typically require heat welding at temperatures between 180°C and 220°C, while PVC materials may use chemical adhesives or specialized welding techniques (22).

Anchorage System Installation:

Proper installation of anchorage systems is essential to ensure the stability of the composite geomembrane system:

Anchorage Trench Excavation: Excavating trenches to the specified dimensions, ensuring that the sides and bottom are properly graded and compacted (22).
Geomembrane Positioning in Anchorage: Carefully positioning the geomembrane into the trench, ensuring that it is properly aligned and that there is adequate material to form the anchorage (22).
Backfilling: Backfilling the trench with the specified material, typically compacted soil or concrete, ensuring that the geomembrane is securely embedded (22).
Surface Sealing: Applying appropriate sealing materials at the top of the anchorage trench to prevent water infiltration and protect the geomembrane from UV exposure (22).

The design and installation of anchorage systems must be carefully coordinated with the overall geomembrane layout to ensure that the entire system is properly secured against potential forces such as water pressure, wind uplift, or thermal expansion (22).

Protection and Cover Layer Installation:

Protecting the composite geomembrane from damage and environmental factors is essential for long-term performance:

Protection Layer Placement: Installing protection layers, such as geotextiles, sand, or gravel, directly over the geomembrane to prevent punctures, abrasions, or UV damage (22).
Cover Layer Construction: Constructing the final cover layer, which may consist of soil, gravel, concrete slabs, or other materials, according to the design specifications (22).
Compaction Control: Ensuring that cover layers are compacted to the specified density without causing damage to the underlying geomembrane (22).
Drainage System Integration: Integrating any required drainage systems, such as perforated pipes or gravel drains, with the cover layer installation (22).

Specialized techniques may be required for installing protection and cover layers on slopes or other challenging terrain. For example, on steep slopes, it may be necessary to use retaining structures or special compaction equipment to ensure that the cover layer remains in place and provides adequate protection (22).

Cold Weather and Wet Condition Adjustments:

Composite geomembrane installation may need to be adjusted when working in cold or wet conditions:

Cold Weather Precautions: When temperatures are below 10°C, special precautions may be necessary, including preheating the geomembrane material, adjusting welding parameters, and protecting the work area from wind and cold (22).
Wet Surface Handling: Installing geomembranes on wet surfaces requires additional care to ensure proper adhesion and prevent the formation of water pockets beneath the membrane (22).
Rain Protection: Implementing measures to protect installed geomembranes from rain, such as covering exposed areas with tarps or temporarily installing protective layers (22).
Freeze-Thaw Cycle Management: Taking steps to prevent damage from freeze-thaw cycles, such as ensuring proper drainage and avoiding installation on frozen ground (22).

By following these installation techniques and procedures carefully, project teams can ensure that composite geomembrane systems are installed correctly, providing reliable, long-lasting seepage control for hydraulic engineering applications.

4.3 Quality Control and Inspection Methods

Maintaining high-quality standards throughout the composite geomembrane installation process is essential to ensure the system's long-term performance and reliability. Comprehensive quality control and inspection procedures help identify and address issues before they compromise the system's integrity (24).

Material Quality Control:

The quality of the composite geomembrane material itself is the foundation of a successful installation. Key quality control measures include:

Manufacturer Certification Review: Verifying that the geomembrane material provided meets the project specifications and relevant industry standards. This includes reviewing material safety data sheets (MSDS), test reports, and certification documents (24).
Physical Inspection: Conducting thorough visual and tactile inspections of the geomembrane rolls to identify any visible defects, such as holes, tears, discolorations, or manufacturing irregularities (24).
Sample Testing: Sending representative samples of the geomembrane material to an independent testing laboratory for verification of key performance properties, including tensile strength, elongation at break, puncture resistance, and permeability (24).
Roll Identification Tracking: Maintaining detailed records of each geomembrane roll's identification number, manufacturer, production date, and installation location. This allows for traceability in case any issues are identified later (24).

Material quality control should begin before the geomembrane arrives on site and continue throughout the installation process. Any rolls that fail to meet the specified quality standards should be rejected and replaced immediately (24).

Base Layer Inspection:

The condition of the base layer directly impacts the performance of the composite geomembrane system. Key inspection points include:

Surface 平整度: Checking that the base layer has been graded to the specified contours with no excessive undulations or depressions. A straightedge or laser level may be used to verify surface regularity (24).
Foreign Object Removal: Ensuring that all rocks, debris, roots, and other potential puncture hazards have been removed from the base layer (24).
Moisture Content: Testing the moisture content of the base layer to ensure it is within the specified range for proper compaction and stability (24).
Compaction Verification: Using appropriate testing methods, such as nuclear density gauges or sand cone tests, to verify that the base layer has been compacted to the required density (24).
Drainage Assessment: Inspecting the effectiveness of any drainage systems installed beneath the base layer to ensure proper water management (24).

A poorly prepared base layer can lead to stress concentrations in the geomembrane, which may result in premature failure. Therefore, thorough inspection of the base layer is critical before proceeding with geomembrane installation (24).

Installation Process Monitoring:

Continuous monitoring of the installation process helps ensure that procedures are followed correctly and quality standards are maintained:

Installation Team Qualification: Verifying that the personnel installing the geomembrane are properly trained and qualified in the specific techniques and equipment being used (24).
Welding Parameter Verification: Regularly checking and recording the temperature, speed, and pressure settings on welding equipment to ensure they remain within the specified ranges for the material being used (24).
Installation Documentation: Maintaining detailed records of all installation activities, including dates, times, locations, personnel involved, and any issues encountered and resolved (24).
Daily Inspections: Conducting daily inspections of the installation work to identify any deviations from the approved methods or quality standards (24).
Problem Resolution Protocols: Establishing clear procedures for addressing any quality issues identified during installation, including documentation, corrective actions, and verification of repairs (24).

Proactive monitoring of the installation process allows for timely identification and resolution of potential issues, minimizing the risk of costly rework or system failures after completion (24).

Weld and Seam Inspection:

The quality of welds and seams is critical to the overall performance of the composite geomembrane system. Comprehensive inspection methods include:

Visual Inspection: Conducting a detailed visual examination of each weld to check for uniformity, continuity, and any visible defects such as holes, burns, or incomplete fusion. This should be done immediately after welding while the material is still warm (24).
Vacuum Box Testing: Using a vacuum box to test the integrity of flat seams. The box is placed over the weld, and a vacuum is created. If any leaks are detected, bubbles will form in the soapy water applied to the seam (24).
Pressure Testing: For extrusion welds, a pressure test can be conducted by inserting a needle into the weld bead and inflating it to the specified pressure. A pressure gauge is used to monitor for any pressure drop, indicating a leak (24).
Random Sampling: Testing a statistically significant sample of welds and seams to ensure overall quality. The exact sampling rate will depend on project specifications and industry standards, but typically ranges between 5% and 10% of all welds (24).
Electronic Leak Detection: Using specialized electronic equipment to detect even the smallest leaks in the geomembrane or its seams. This method is particularly useful for detecting pinholes or other minor defects (24).

Weld and seam inspection should be performed by trained personnel using calibrated equipment. Any defective welds identified should be marked for repair or replacement immediately (24).

Final System Testing:

Before the composite geomembrane system is put into service, comprehensive final testing is essential to verify its overall performance:

Integrity Testing: Conducting system-wide integrity tests to ensure that the entire geomembrane installation is free from leaks. This may involve filling the structure with water and monitoring for any signs of seepage (24).
Functionality Verification: Ensuring that all components of the system, including drainage systems, anchorage points, and protection layers, are functioning as designed (24).
Documentation Review: Conducting a final review of all installation records, test results, and quality control documentation to ensure completeness and compliance with project requirements (24).
Defect Resolution: Ensuring that all identified defects have been properly addressed and retested to confirm resolution (24).
Handover Documentation: Preparing comprehensive documentation for the client, including as-built drawings, material certifications, test results, and maintenance recommendations (24).

The final system testing phase provides the last opportunity to identify and address any issues before the composite geomembrane system is commissioned. Thorough testing ensures that the system meets all performance requirements and is ready for service (24).

Long-Term Monitoring Plan:

To ensure the continued performance of the composite geomembrane system over its service life, a long-term monitoring plan should be established:

Periodic Inspections: Scheduling regular inspections of the system at defined intervals, typically annually or biannually, to identify any signs of damage, deterioration, or performance issues (24).
Monitoring Equipment Installation: Installing permanent monitoring equipment, such as piezometers, settlement gauges, or strain sensors, to continuously track the system's performance (24).
Data Collection and Analysis: Establishing procedures for collecting and analyzing monitoring data to identify trends or potential issues early (24).
Maintenance Protocols: Developing clear procedures for routine maintenance and repairs, including access methods, repair techniques, and materials specifications (24).
Emergency Response Plan: Creating a plan for responding to any emergencies, such as leaks, punctures, or structural failures, including contact information, equipment needs, and repair procedures (24).

Long-term monitoring is particularly important for large or critical hydraulic structures, where early detection of potential issues can prevent costly repairs or system failures. By implementing a comprehensive monitoring plan, owners can ensure the continued performance and longevity of their composite geomembrane systems (24).

Through rigorous quality control and inspection procedures at every stage of the project, from material procurement to final system testing, engineers can ensure that composite geomembrane systems provide reliable, long-lasting seepage control for a wide range of hydraulic engineering applications.

5. International Case Studies

5.1 Reservoir and Dam Applications

Reservoirs and dams represent significant applications for composite geomembrane systems, where their ability to provide reliable seepage control is essential for structural integrity and water resource management. The following case studies illustrate successful implementations in this sector (1).

Kokhav Hayarden Pumped Storage Project, Israel (Completed 2022):

The Kokhav Hayarden pumped storage project in Israel represents a significant application of composite geomembrane technology in a challenging environment. This project features an anchorage system that involves heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands embedded in vertical trenches (1).

Key technical aspects of this project include:

Anchorage Innovation: The unique anchorage system was designed to accept large settlements and differential displacements, a critical consideration for a pumped storage facility where water levels fluctuate frequently (1).
Material Selection: High-quality HDPE geomembrane material was chosen for its excellent resistance to environmental stress cracking and ability to maintain performance over a wide temperature range (1).
Construction Methodology: The installation process involved careful coordination between excavation, geomembrane placement, and anchorage system construction to ensure the integrity of the overall system (1).

The Kokhav Hayarden project demonstrates the successful application of composite geomembrane technology in a high-stress, dynamic environment. The innovative anchorage system has proven effective in maintaining system stability despite significant water level variations (1).

Abdelmoumen Pumped Storage Project, Morocco (Completed 2023):

The Abdelmoumen pumped storage project in Morocco represents another significant application of composite geomembrane technology. This project maintained the concept of heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands while incorporating a specific construction method designed to conform to different embankment materials and subgrade preparation requirements (1).

Notable features of this project include:

Material Enhancement: The project utilized a lacquered geomembrane specifically intended to enhance durability in an environment with particularly high UV radiation, a common challenge in Morocco's climate (1).
Adaptability to Local Conditions: The construction methodology was tailored to accommodate the specific characteristics of the local embankment materials and subgrade conditions, demonstrating the flexibility of composite geomembrane systems (1).
Comprehensive Testing: Extensive testing was conducted throughout the installation process to verify the integrity of the geomembrane and its connections, ensuring compliance with international quality standards (1).

The Abdelmoumen project showcases the successful adaptation of composite geomembrane technology to meet the specific challenges of a high-UV environment while maintaining the core principles of effective seepage control (1).

Pinnapuram Pumped Storage Project, India (Ongoing):

The Pinnapuram pumped storage project in India represents a large-scale application of composite geomembrane technology currently under construction. This project involves installing geomembrane liners on three large embankment dams in the lower reservoir and along a 6.6 km-long water conveyance system (1).

Key aspects of this ongoing project include:

Scale of Application: The extensive nature of this project, covering multiple dams and a long conveyance system, demonstrates the scalability of composite geomembrane technology for large-scale hydraulic projects (1).
Challenging Terrain: The project is being implemented in challenging terrain, requiring careful planning and execution to ensure proper geomembrane installation and anchorage (1).
Innovative Construction Techniques: The project is incorporating innovative construction techniques to overcome site-specific challenges, including specialized equipment for handling and installing the geomembrane in difficult-to-access areas (1).

The Pinnapuram project exemplifies the growing international acceptance of composite geomembrane technology for major hydraulic infrastructure projects. When completed, it will serve as a valuable reference for future large-scale applications in similar environments (1).

Brandbach Dam Rehabilitation, Germany:

The Brandbach dam in southern Germany provides an interesting case study in composite geomembrane application for dam rehabilitation. After more than 75 years of operation, the concrete lining of this 16m-high dam needed to be sealed. The solution involved the installation of a drained geomembrane system, marking the first application of this technique in Germany (7).

Key elements of this rehabilitation project include:

First-of-Its-Kind Application: The use of a drained geomembrane system represented a pioneering approach in Germany, demonstrating the growing acceptance of this technology for dam rehabilitation (7).
Structural Adaptability: The design of the geomembrane system was carefully adapted to the existing dam structure, ensuring compatibility with the original concrete core and curved ground plan (7).
Drainage Integration: The inclusion of a drainage system within the geomembrane installation addressed concerns about potential water accumulation behind the liner, enhancing the system's long-term reliability (7).

This project highlights the versatility of composite geomembrane technology for rehabilitating aging hydraulic structures, offering a cost-effective and efficient alternative to traditional repair methods (7).

Shaver Lake Dam, USA:

The Shaver Lake dam in California, USA, represents another significant application of composite geomembrane technology. This concrete gravity arch structure, standing 56m high with a length exceeding 530m, was completed in 1927 and plays a critical role in supporting the Eastwood powerhouse, an underground pumped-storage power station with a capacity of 250 MW (11).

Key features of the composite geomembrane installation at Shaver Lake dam include:

Drained Geomembrane System: The project involved the installation of a drained geomembrane system, which helps manage any water that might accumulate behind the liner (11).
Structural Integration: The design carefully considered the interaction between the new geomembrane system and the existing concrete structure, ensuring compatibility and structural integrity (11).
Environmental Considerations: Special attention was given to minimizing environmental impacts during the installation process, including measures to protect water quality and local ecosystems (11).

The Shaver Lake dam project demonstrates the successful application of composite geomembrane technology in a high-stakes, high-value hydraulic infrastructure project. The system has been performing effectively since installation, providing reliable seepage control for this important water resource and power generation facility (11).

These case studies illustrate the diverse applications of composite geomembrane technology in reservoir and dam environments across different geographical regions and climatic conditions. They demonstrate the technology's adaptability, reliability, and effectiveness in providing long-term seepage control solutions for critical hydraulic structures.

5.2 Canal Lining Applications

Canals represent another important application area for composite geomembrane systems, where their ability to reduce seepage and improve water conveyance efficiency is highly valued. The following case studies illustrate successful implementations in canal lining applications .

Llangollen Canal Rehabilitation, United Kingdom:

The Llangollen canal in North Wales, UK, provides an interesting case study in composite geomembrane application for canal rehabilitation. As part of the UK Waterways' ongoing improvement program for the UK canal network, a section of this 200-year-old canal required relining due to leakage (12).

Key aspects of this project include:

Material Selection: Engineers at UK Waterways' Leeds headquarters specified a bituminous geomembrane lining system, which offered a simpler design compared to other commonly used systems. The ability to bond the bituminous geomembrane directly to concrete was a significant factor in its selection (12).
Additional Complexities: The project involved additional complexities, including constructing a new concrete retaining wall along one bank and creating water access points for livestock through watering hole structures constructed in concrete. These elements required careful integration with the geomembrane system (12).
Installation Challenges: The installation process had to navigate the constraints of an operational canal environment, requiring careful planning and execution to minimize disruption to canal users (12).

The Llangollen canal project demonstrates the successful application of composite geomembrane technology in a historic canal system, combining modern seepage control solutions with necessary infrastructure upgrades while maintaining the canal's functionality and heritage value (12).

Canal Rehabilitation Underwater, Multiple Locations:

The development of specialized techniques for underwater canal rehabilitation represents an innovative application of composite geomembrane technology. This approach allows for canal repairs to be conducted without draining the water, minimizing disruption to water supply and other canal uses .

Key features of underwater canal rehabilitation projects include:

Innovative Technology: The SIBELONMAT® system represents a breakthrough in underwater canal rehabilitation. This technology uses panels of double geomembrane mattress filled with mortar, joined with watertight devices, allowing repairs to be made without reducing water flow .
Remote Operation Capability: This technology can be implemented using remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) for unmanned procedures, reducing risks to workers and allowing access to difficult-to-reach areas .
Proven Success: The technology has already been successfully installed underwater in two pilot projects in water supply canals, demonstrating its effectiveness in maintaining water flow while conducting necessary repairs .

The development of underwater canal rehabilitation techniques represents a significant advancement in composite geomembrane applications. These methods offer new possibilities for maintaining and upgrading canal systems with minimal disruption to water supplies and other critical uses .

General Canal Lining Applications:

Composite geomembranes have been used to line all types of canals, including hydropower canals with high water velocities, large irrigation canals with varying sections, and small flumes and aqueducts . These applications share several common characteristics:

Flow Enhancement: In addition to their waterproofing function, exposed geomembrane systems provide the additional benefit of increasing water flow efficiency. The smooth surface of the geomembrane reduces friction, allowing water to move more freely through the canal .
Design Adaptability: Canal lining projects require careful consideration of varying cross-sections, flow rates, and environmental conditions. Composite geomembrane systems can be customized to meet the specific requirements of each canal section .
Rehabilitation of Existing Linings: Many canal lining projects involve rehabilitating deteriorated concrete or bituminous concrete linings and repairing failing joints. Composite geomembranes offer a cost-effective solution for extending the service life of these structures .

A notable example of general canal lining application involves a project in Spain where geomembranes were used to line irrigation canals. The Spanish institution "Public Works Research and Experimental Center (CEDEX)" has studied the behavior of these geomembranes for decades, monitoring over 200 structures through technical inspections, material sampling, experimental testing, and subsequent recommendations to improve the safety and durability of these hydraulic structures (2).

These case studies illustrate the diverse applications of composite geomembrane technology in canal lining projects, demonstrating their versatility in addressing various challenges related to water conveyance efficiency and seepage control.

5.3 Levee and Embankment Applications

Levees and embankments represent another important application area for composite geomembrane systems, where their ability to control seepage and enhance structural stability is highly valued. The following case studies illustrate successful implementations in levee and embankment applications (1).

Kokhav Hayarden Pumped Storage Project, Israel:

While primarily a reservoir application, the Kokhav Hayarden pumped storage project in Israel also includes significant levee and embankment components. The project features an innovative anchorage system that involves heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands embedded in vertical trenches (1).

Key aspects relevant to levee and embankment applications include:

Anchorage System: The unique anchorage system was designed to accept large settlements and differential displacements, a critical consideration for embankment structures that may experience varying degrees of settlement over time (1).
Material Performance: The high-quality HDPE geomembrane material demonstrates excellent resistance to environmental stress cracking and maintains performance over a wide temperature range, important factors for long-term performance in embankment applications (1).
Construction Methodology: The installation process involved careful coordination between excavation, geomembrane placement, and anchorage system construction, providing valuable insights for similar embankment projects (1).

The Kokhav Hayarden project demonstrates the successful application of composite geomembrane technology in a challenging embankment environment. The system has been performing effectively since installation, providing reliable seepage control and contributing to the overall stability of the pumped storage facility (1).

Abdelmoumen Pumped Storage Project, Morocco:

The Abdelmoumen pumped storage project in Morocco represents another significant application of composite geomembrane technology with important embankment components. This project maintained the concept of heat-seaming the geomembrane liner to geomembrane anchor bands while incorporating a specific construction method designed to conform to different embankment materials and subgrade preparation requirements (1).

Notable features relevant to levee and embankment applications include:

Material Enhancement: The project utilized a lacquered geomembrane specifically intended to enhance durability in an environment with particularly high UV radiation, addressing a common challenge in many embankment applications (1).
Adaptability to Local Conditions: The construction methodology was tailored to accommodate the specific characteristics of the local embankment materials and subgrade conditions, demonstrating the flexibility of composite geomembrane systems (1).
Quality Control Protocols: Extensive testing was conducted throughout the installation process to verify the integrity of the geomembrane and its connections, ensuring compliance with international quality standards for embankment applications (1).

The Abdelmoumen project showcases the successful adaptation of composite geomembrane technology to meet the specific challenges of embankment construction in a high-UV environment while maintaining the core principles of effective seepage control (1).

General Levee and Embankment Applications:

Composite geomembranes have been successfully applied in numerous levee and embankment projects worldwide. These applications share several common characteristics:

Seepage Control: Composite geomembranes provide effective control of seepage through embankment structures, reducing water loss and preventing potential stability issues associated with excessive seepage (1).
Settlement Adaptability: The flexibility of composite geomembranes allows them to accommodate moderate settlement and differential movement in embankment structures without compromising their integrity (29).
Erosion Protection: In addition to seepage control, composite geomembranes can provide protection against surface erosion caused by wave action or rainfall, enhancing the overall durability of embankment structures (1).

A notable example of general levee and embankment application involves a project in the USA where geomembranes were used to control seepage in earthen levees along a major river. The project demonstrated the effectiveness of composite geomembrane systems in challenging hydraulic environments, providing reliable seepage control and contributing to the overall flood protection system (14).

These case studies illustrate the diverse applications of composite geomembrane technology in levee and embankment projects, demonstrating their versatility in addressing various challenges related to seepage control and structural stability.

5.4 Comparative Analysis of Case Studies

The diverse case studies presented in this manual provide valuable insights into the application of composite geomembrane technology across different types of hydraulic structures and environmental conditions. A comparative analysis of these cases reveals several important patterns and considerations for engineering professionals (1).

Regional Variations in Application:

The case studies demonstrate clear regional variations in how composite geomembrane technology is applied:

European Applications: European projects, such as the Brandbach dam in Germany and the Llangollen canal in the UK, tend to emphasize innovation in anchorage systems and integration with historic structures. These projects often involve rehabilitating aging infrastructure while maintaining its heritage value (7).
North American Applications: Projects in the USA, like the Shaver Lake dam, typically focus on large-scale implementations in high-value water resource and power generation facilities. These applications often involve complex integration with existing concrete structures (11).
Middle Eastern and North African Applications: Projects in Israel and Morocco highlight adaptations to high-temperature, high-UV environments. These applications often incorporate specialized materials and construction methods to address regional climatic challenges (1).
Asian Applications: The ongoing Pinnapuram project in India demonstrates the application of composite geomembrane technology in large-scale infrastructure development, often involving multiple structures and extensive water conveyance systems (1).

These regional variations reflect the adaptability of composite geomembrane technology to diverse environmental conditions and engineering traditions while maintaining core principles of effective seepage control (1).

Common Success Factors:

Despite their differences, successful composite geomembrane projects share several common factors:

Thorough Pre-construction Planning: Projects that invested time and resources in thorough site investigations, material selection, and detailed planning consistently reported fewer installation issues and better overall performance (22).
Innovative Anchorage Systems: The development of innovative anchorage systems tailored to specific project requirements emerged as a key factor in the success of many projects, particularly those with challenging site conditions or high water level fluctuations (1).
Stringent Quality Control: Projects that implemented rigorous quality control measures at every stage—from material inspection to final system testing—reported higher performance and fewer long-term issues (24).
Adaptability to Local Conditions: Successful projects demonstrated a willingness to adapt standard methods to meet local site conditions, material availability, and environmental factors (1).

These common success factors highlight the importance of combining technical excellence with practical adaptability in implementing composite geomembrane systems (1).

Challenges and Solutions:

The case studies also reveal common challenges encountered in composite geomembrane applications and effective solutions:

Anchorage System Design: The design of effective anchorage systems was identified as a significant challenge, particularly in structures with frequent water level fluctuations. Solutions included innovative trench designs, mechanical fasteners, and heat-seamed connections to geomembrane anchor bands (1).
Material Compatibility: Ensuring compatibility between the geomembrane material and local environmental conditions emerged as a common challenge. Solutions included selecting specialized materials like lacquered geomembranes for high-UV environments and chemically resistant materials for specific applications (1).
Underwater Installation: Installing geomembrane systems in wet or underwater conditions presented significant challenges. Solutions included the development of specialized underwater connection methods and remotely operated installation techniques .
Cold Weather Installation: Projects in colder climates faced challenges related to material brittleness and reduced welding efficiency. Solutions included adjusting welding parameters, preheating materials, and implementing weather protection measures (22).

The identification of these challenges and solutions provides valuable guidance for engineers planning future composite geomembrane projects, helping them anticipate potential issues and develop effective mitigation strategies (1).

Long-term Performance:

The case studies provide evidence of the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems:

Service Life Expectations: While specific service life claims vary, many projects report successful performance ranging from 20 to 60 years, depending on material selection, installation quality, and environmental conditions (58).
Maintenance Requirements: Well-designed and properly installed systems typically require minimal maintenance beyond periodic inspections and minor repairs. This represents a significant advantage over traditional materials like concrete, which often require more frequent and costly maintenance (51).
Performance Monitoring: Projects that implemented comprehensive monitoring systems reported better long-term performance and earlier detection of potential issues. This included both visual inspections and more sophisticated monitoring techniques (24).

The long-term performance data from these case studies supports the growing confidence in composite geomembrane systems as reliable, cost-effective solutions for seepage control in hydraulic engineering applications (51).

By examining these case studies and their comparative analysis, engineering professionals can gain valuable insights into the practical application of composite geomembrane technology, identify potential challenges, and develop effective solutions for their own projects.

6. Comparative Analysis with Other Seepage Control Technologies

6.1 Composite Geomembranes vs. Traditional Concrete Lining

Composite geomembrane systems and traditional concrete lining represent two primary approaches to seepage control in hydraulic engineering. This section provides a detailed comparison of these two technologies across multiple criteria to help engineers make informed decisions about their application (51).

Material Properties Comparison:

The fundamental material properties of composite geomembranes and concrete differ significantly, influencing their performance in various applications:

Impermeability: Composite geomembranes, particularly HDPE-based systems, exhibit near-impermeable characteristics with permeability coefficients as low as 10⁻¹⁴ m/s (58). In contrast, concrete has a much higher permeability, typically on the order of 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁹ m/s, making it significantly less effective at preventing seepage (63).
Strength and Flexibility: Concrete offers high compressive strength but relatively low tensile strength and flexibility. Composite geomembranes, on the other hand, possess lower compressive strength but significantly higher tensile strength and flexibility, allowing them to accommodate moderate deformations without cracking (29).
Thermal Expansion: Concrete has a relatively high coefficient of thermal expansion, making it susceptible to cracking due to temperature fluctuations. Composite geomembranes also expand and contract with temperature changes but their flexibility allows them to accommodate these movements more effectively (29).
Chemical Resistance: The chemical resistance of composite geomembranes varies depending on the specific material used (e.g., HDPE, PVC, etc.), but many formulations offer excellent resistance to a wide range of chemicals. Concrete, while generally durable, can be susceptible to chemical attack from acids, sulfates, and other aggressive substances (58).

These material property differences make composite geomembranes particularly well-suited for applications where flexibility, chemical resistance, and near-impermeability are required, while concrete remains a strong choice for applications requiring high compressive strength and rigidity (51).

Structural Performance Comparison:

The structural performance of composite geomembranes and concrete lining systems differs significantly in several key areas:

Load-Bearing Capacity: Concrete lining systems provide excellent load-bearing capacity and can support heavy loads, making them suitable for areas where traffic or heavy equipment is anticipated. Composite geomembranes, while capable of supporting moderate loads when properly installed, are generally not designed for heavy traffic or concentrated loads (51).
Deformation Tolerance: Composite geomembranes can accommodate moderate differential settlements and deformations without compromising their integrity, a significant advantage in areas prone to seismic activity or soil consolidation. Concrete lining systems are much less tolerant of deformation and are more likely to crack or fail under similar conditions (29).
Joint Performance: Joints represent potential weak points in both systems, but for different reasons. Concrete joints can be difficult to seal effectively and are prone to leakage if not properly maintained. Composite geomembrane joints, while requiring careful installation, can achieve near-100% efficiency when properly executed, particularly with heat welding techniques (24).
Slope Stability: On steep slopes, composite geomembranes may require specialized anchorage systems to maintain stability, adding complexity to the design and installation. Concrete lining systems, while heavier, can provide better inherent stability on slopes when properly reinforced and anchored (51).

The structural performance comparison indicates that composite geomembranes offer superior performance in terms of deformation tolerance and joint efficiency, while concrete lining systems excel in load-bearing capacity and slope stability (51).

Construction Process Comparison:

The construction processes for composite geomembranes and concrete lining systems differ significantly in terms of complexity, time requirements, and resource needs:

Installation Speed: Composite geomembrane installations are typically much faster than concrete lining systems. A well-organized crew can install thousands of square meters of geomembrane in a single day, while concrete installations are inherently slower due to mixing, placing, curing, and finishing requirements (22).
Site Preparation: Both systems require careful site preparation, but the nature of the requirements differs. Composite geomembranes require a smooth, uniform base free of sharp objects, while concrete requires a properly graded and compacted base capable of supporting the weight of the concrete (22).
Skill Requirements: Composite geomembrane installation requires specialized skills in material handling, welding, and quality control, which may not be widely available in all regions. Concrete construction, while requiring its own set of skills, is generally more familiar to construction crews in many areas (22).
Weather Sensitivity: Both systems are affected by weather conditions, but in different ways. Composite geomembrane installations are particularly sensitive to high winds, heavy rain, and extreme temperatures, which can affect material handling and welding quality. Concrete installations are sensitive to freezing temperatures during curing and high temperatures that can cause rapid drying and cracking (22).

In terms of construction process, composite geomembranes generally offer advantages in terms of installation speed and reduced curing time, while concrete lining systems benefit from more widespread familiarity and established construction practices (22).

Cost Comparison:

The cost comparison between composite geomembrane and concrete lining systems involves consideration of both initial costs and long-term expenses:

Material Costs: The material cost for composite geomembranes typically ranges between 30% to 50% of the material cost for equivalent concrete lining systems (51). This significant cost advantage makes composite geomembranes an attractive option for many projects.
Installation Costs: Installation costs for composite geomembranes can vary widely depending on site conditions, access, and the complexity of the design. In general, however, composite geomembrane installation costs are lower than those for concrete, particularly for large areas (51).
Maintenance Costs: Concrete lining systems typically require more frequent and costly maintenance over their service life, including crack repairs, joint resealing, and periodic resurfacing. Composite geomembrane systems, when properly installed, require minimal maintenance beyond periodic inspections and occasional minor repairs (51).
Life Cycle Costs: When considering the total life cycle costs over a 50-year period, composite geomembrane systems often prove to be significantly more cost-effective than concrete lining systems, particularly when factors such as reduced maintenance, longer service life, and lower energy consumption (due to improved water retention) are taken into account (51).

The cost comparison clearly favors composite geomembrane systems in terms of both initial investment and long-term life cycle costs, making them a compelling economic choice for many hydraulic engineering applications (51).

Environmental Impact Comparison:

The environmental impacts of composite geomembrane and concrete lining systems differ significantly in several key areas:

Carbon Footprint: The production of concrete generates significant amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change. In contrast, composite geomembranes, particularly those made from recycled materials, have a much lower carbon footprint (51).
Resource Consumption: Concrete production requires large quantities of energy and raw materials, including cement, aggregates, and water. Composite geomembrane production, while also resource-intensive, generally requires fewer raw materials and less energy per unit area (51).
Waste Generation: Both systems generate waste during construction, but the nature of the waste differs. Concrete waste is typically heavy and difficult to recycle, while unused composite geomembrane material can often be returned to the manufacturer for recycling or reuse (51).
Water Conservation: Composite geomembrane systems, with their near-impermeable properties, help conserve water by reducing seepage losses. This water conservation benefit can have significant environmental and economic value, particularly in arid regions (51).

From an environmental perspective, composite geomembrane systems generally offer advantages in terms of lower carbon footprint, reduced resource consumption, and better water conservation, making them a more sustainable choice for many applications (51).

Based on this comprehensive comparison, composite geomembrane systems generally offer superior performance in terms of impermeability, flexibility, installation speed, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability. Concrete lining systems, however, remain the preferred choice for applications requiring high compressive strength, load-bearing capacity, or resistance to physical abuse. The optimal choice between these technologies depends on the specific requirements of each project, with many factors to consider beyond simple material properties (51).

6.2 Composite Geomembranes vs. Other Membrane Materials

Composite geomembranes represent one category of synthetic membrane materials used for seepage control in hydraulic engineering. This section provides a comparative analysis of composite geomembranes with other commonly used membrane materials, helping engineers make informed decisions about material selection for their projects (58).

HDPE vs. Composite Geomembranes:

High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) is one of the most commonly used materials for both single-layer and composite geomembranes. The comparison between single-layer HDPE and composite HDPE geomembranes reveals several important differences:

Structural Configuration: Single-layer HDPE geomembranes consist of a single homogeneous layer of HDPE material, typically 1.0mm to 3.0mm in thickness. Composite HDPE geomembranes incorporate one or more layers of geotextile bonded to the HDPE membrane, creating a more complex structure (58).
Mechanical Properties: Composite HDPE geomembranes generally exhibit superior mechanical properties compared to single-layer HDPE, including higher tensile strength, puncture resistance, and tear resistance. For example, composite HDPE geomembranes can achieve tensile strengths of 20 MPa or higher, while single-layer HDPE typically ranges between 17 MPa and 25 MPa (57).
Installation Considerations: Single-layer HDPE geomembranes are lighter and easier to handle, which can simplify installation in some applications. Composite HDPE geomembranes, while slightly heavier, benefit from the reinforcement provided by the geotextile layers, which can make them more resistant to installation damage (58).
Application Suitability: Single-layer HDPE geomembranes are often preferred for applications where weight and flexibility are primary considerations, such as certain types of landfill liners. Composite HDPE geomembranes are typically recommended for more demanding applications where enhanced mechanical properties are required, such as reservoirs, dams, and canals (58).

The choice between single-layer HDPE and composite HDPE geomembranes depends largely on the specific requirements of the project, with composite systems generally offering enhanced performance at a slightly higher cost (58).

PVC vs. Composite Geomembranes:

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) is another commonly used material for geomembranes, with both single-layer and composite configurations available. The comparison between PVC and composite geomembranes reveals several key differences:

Material Composition: PVC geomembranes are made from polyvinyl chloride resin, typically plasticized to achieve the desired flexibility. Composite geomembranes can incorporate PVC as the membrane material, combined with geotextile layers for reinforcement (4).
Mechanical Properties: PVC geomembranes offer good tensile strength and elongation properties, with typical tensile strengths ranging between 15 MPa and 20 MPa. Composite PVC geomembranes, with their additional geotextile layers, generally exhibit higher tensile strength and puncture resistance than single-layer PVC (4).
Durability: The durability of PVC geomembranes has been studied extensively. Research on PVC-P geomembranes installed in Spanish irrigation reservoirs for 18-31 years showed significant loss of plasticizer (71.0% to 84.3%), but retained adequate tensile strength for their intended use (4). This research indicates that the durability of PVC-based geomembranes is a function of both plasticizer loss and the condition of the synthetic reinforcement fibers (4).
Installation Considerations: PVC geomembranes can be welded using heat or solvent-based adhesives, and they generally exhibit good cold-weather performance. Composite PVC geomembranes require careful handling to prevent damage to the geotextile layers during installation (4).
Application Suitability: PVC geomembranes are often preferred for applications where chemical resistance and flexibility are important, such as wastewater treatment facilities and certain industrial applications. Composite PVC geomembranes extend these capabilities by providing enhanced mechanical properties, making them suitable for more demanding hydraulic structures (4).

The comparison between PVC and composite geomembranes highlights the trade-offs between material-specific properties and the enhanced performance provided by composite structures. In many cases, composite PVC geomembranes offer the best combination of PVC's inherent advantages with improved mechanical properties (4).

EPDM vs. Composite Geomembranes:

Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) is another synthetic rubber material used for geomembranes, with distinct characteristics compared to composite systems:

Material Composition: EPDM geomembranes are made from a synthetic rubber compound, typically containing ethylene, propylene, and a diene monomer for cross-linking. Composite geomembranes using EPDM as the membrane material combine this rubber layer with geotextile reinforcement (69).
Mechanical Properties: EPDM geomembranes offer excellent elongation properties and low-temperature flexibility, with typical elongation at break values exceeding 500%. Composite EPDM geomembranes build on these properties by adding tensile strength and puncture resistance from the geotextile layers (69).
Durability: EPDM geomembranes are known for their excellent resistance to UV radiation, ozone, and weathering, making them suitable for exposed applications. Composite EPDM geomembranes benefit from these properties while also gaining additional protection from the geotextile layers (69).
Installation Considerations: EPDM geomembranes can be installed using heat welding, adhesive bonding, or mechanical fasteners. Composite EPDM geomembranes require careful handling during installation to prevent damage to the geotextile layers (69).
Application Suitability: EPDM geomembranes are often preferred for applications where long-term UV exposure is a concern, such as rooftop waterproofing and certain types of environmental containment. Composite EPDM geomembranes extend these capabilities to more demanding hydraulic applications where enhanced mechanical properties are required (69).

The comparison between EPDM and composite geomembranes demonstrates the value of combining the inherent advantages of rubber-based materials with the reinforcement provided by geotextile layers. This combination creates a versatile material suitable for a wide range of hydraulic engineering applications (69).

GCL vs. Composite Geomembranes:

Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs) represent another category of seepage control materials, with different characteristics compared to composite geomembranes:

Material Composition: GCLs typically consist of a layer of sodium bentonite clay sandwiched between two layers of geotextile or 土工织物，held together by stitching, adhesive, or needle punching. Composite geomembranes, in contrast, combine synthetic polymer membranes with geotextile layers (10).
Hydraulic Performance: When hydrated, GCLs form a low-permeability barrier with a permeability typically on the order of 10⁻⁹ m/s to 10⁻¹⁰ m/s. Composite geomembranes, particularly HDPE-based systems, achieve much lower permeabilities (10⁻¹⁴ m/s or lower), making them more effective in applications where minimal seepage is critical (58).
Installation Considerations: GCLs are generally lighter and easier to handle than composite geomembranes, which can simplify installation in some applications. However, GCLs require careful moisture management during installation to ensure proper hydration and performance. Composite geomembranes require specialized equipment and skills for proper welding and installation (10).
Application Suitability: GCLs are often preferred for applications where rapid installation and lower cost are primary considerations, such as certain types of landfill covers and temporary containment systems. Composite geomembranes are typically recommended for more demanding applications where long-term performance and low permeability are critical, such as reservoirs, dams, and canals (10).

A case study involving the use of GCLs at two mine sites provides valuable insights into their performance. At a site in Colorado, USA, tailings from a historical mill were being capped using a GCL buried under a soil layer to reduce infiltration. During construction, the contractor proposed a method that required 75-ton loaded scrapers to travel over the buried GCL on a 3H:1V slope. A full-scale test pad was constructed to determine if the loaded scrapers would damage the underlying GCL. The results showed that the GCL performed well without significant damage, demonstrating its suitability for certain applications (10).

The comparison between GCLs and composite geomembranes reveals distinct advantages and limitations for each material. While GCLs offer advantages in terms of weight and ease of installation, composite geomembranes generally provide superior hydraulic performance and long-term durability for critical hydraulic applications (10).

Based on this comprehensive comparison of composite geomembranes with other membrane materials, it is clear that composite systems offer significant advantages in terms of mechanical performance, durability, and application versatility. By combining the inherent advantages of synthetic polymer membranes with the reinforcement provided by geotextile layers, composite geomembranes achieve a unique balance of properties that make them well-suited for demanding hydraulic engineering applications (58).

7. Standards and Specifications

7.1 International Standards for Composite Geomembranes

Composite geomembrane technology is governed by a comprehensive set of international standards that establish material specifications, testing methods, and performance requirements. These standards play a critical role in ensuring the quality, consistency, and reliability of composite geomembrane products used in hydraulic engineering applications (57).

ASTM International Standards:

ASTM International (formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials) has developed several important standards related to composite geomembranes:

ASTM D6751: Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels. While this standard is primarily focused on biodiesel fuel, it includes requirements for composite mesh sheets used to prevent concrete cracking and delamination. The sheet is designed to prevent spalled pieces of concrete from detaching from the concrete surface, reducing hazards and damage caused by falling debris (20).
ASTM D6693: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geosynthetics. This standard specifies procedures for determining the tensile properties of geosynthetics, including composite geomembranes. It covers both wide-width and narrow-width specimens and provides guidance on specimen preparation, testing equipment, and data analysis (71).
ASTM D4833: Standard Test Method for Determining the Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles and Geomembranes. This test method is used to evaluate the puncture resistance of composite geomembranes by measuring the force required to push a 50mm diameter probe through the material at a specified rate (60).
ASTM D5084: Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter. This standard provides methods for determining the hydraulic conductivity (permeability) of saturated porous materials, which is an important parameter for evaluating the seepage control performance of composite geomembranes (60).
ASTM D5397: Standard Test Method for Environmental Stress-Crack Resistance of Geomembranes. This test method is used to evaluate the resistance of composite geomembranes to environmental stress cracking, a phenomenon where materials crack under the combined effects of tensile stress and chemical exposure (71).

These ASTM standards provide important benchmarks for material performance and testing, ensuring that composite geomembrane products meet consistent quality standards across different manufacturers and regions (57).

ISO International Standards:

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has also developed standards related to composite geomembranes and their applications:

ISO 10319: Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products - Determination of Tensile Properties. This standard specifies methods for determining the tensile properties of geotextiles and related products, including composite geomembranes (57).
ISO 13433: Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products - Determination of Puncture Resistance. This standard specifies a method for determining the puncture resistance of geotextiles and related products, which is an important property for composite geomembranes (57).
ISO 13438: Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products - Determination of Seam Strength. This standard specifies methods for determining the strength of seams in geotextiles and related products, which is critical for evaluating the integrity of composite geomembrane installations (57).
ISO 13441: Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products - Vocabulary. This standard provides definitions for terms related to geotextiles and geotextile-related products, establishing a common language for the industry (57).

ISO standards are particularly important for international projects and trade, as they provide a globally recognized framework for material specifications and testing methods (57).

European Norms (EN):

The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) has developed several EN standards related to composite geomembranes:

EN 13707: Flexible Sheets for Waterproofing - Reinforced Bitumen Sheets for Roof Waterproofing - Definitions and Characteristics. This standard specifies definitions and characteristics for flexible reinforced bitumen sheets intended for roofing applications. While not specifically focused on composite geomembranes for hydraulic applications, it includes relevant testing methods and performance criteria (41).
EN 14695: Flexible Sheets for Waterproofing - Bitumen Waterproofing Sheets for Roofing - Definitions and Characteristics. This standard specifies definitions and characteristics for bitumen waterproofing sheets intended for roofing applications, including those used as underlays for discontinuous roofing (43).
EN 13498: Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products - Characteristics Required for Use in Earthworks, Embankments, and Retaining Structures. This standard specifies the characteristics required for geotextiles and related products used in earthworks, embankments, and retaining structures, which may include composite geomembranes (57).

European norms are widely used throughout Europe and provide important guidance for composite geomembrane applications in hydraulic engineering projects across the continent (57).

Other Regional and National Standards:

In addition to the international standards mentioned above, various countries and regions have developed their own standards for composite geomembranes:

China: China has developed several standards related to composite geomembranes, including GB/T 17642-2025 "Geosynthetics - Nonwoven Geotextile Composite Geomembranes," which was published in April 2025 and will come into effect on November 1, 2025, replacing the 2008 version (1). This standard specifies the technical requirements, testing methods, inspection rules, and marking, packaging, transportation, and storage requirements for nonwoven geotextile composite geomembranes (1).
Spain: The Spanish institution "Public Works Research and Experimental Center (CEDEX)" has conducted extensive research on the behavior of geomembranes, particularly in hydraulic applications. Their work has informed the development of Spanish standards and guidelines for composite geomembrane use in reservoirs, dams, and canals (2).
Germany: German standards for composite geomembranes are developed by the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). These standards address material specifications, testing methods, and application guidelines for various hydraulic engineering applications (7).

These regional and national standards reflect the specific needs and conditions of different countries and regions, while still maintaining alignment with broader international standards where possible (57).

Standards for Specific Applications:

Several standards specifically address the use of composite geomembranes in particular types of hydraulic engineering applications:

Reservoirs and Dams: Standards for reservoir and dam applications typically address material specifications, installation methods, and performance requirements specific to these structures. For example, the Spanish research on the durability of PVC-P geomembranes installed in irrigation reservoirs provides valuable insights for standards development in this area (4).
Canals and Waterways: Standards for canal applications often include provisions related to flow characteristics, erosion resistance, and compatibility with water conveyance systems. The Llangollen canal project in the UK demonstrates how composite geomembrane standards can be applied in historic canal systems (12).
Underwater Applications: The development of standards for underwater applications of composite geomembranes is an emerging area. The SIBELONMAT® system, which allows for underwater canal repairs, is helping to establish new standards and guidelines for this specialized application .
Waste Containment: Standards for waste containment applications typically include more stringent requirements for chemical resistance, durability, and leak detection. These standards are often referenced in hydraulic engineering applications where contamination prevention is critical (10).

By adhering to these international, regional, and application-specific standards, engineers can ensure that composite geomembrane systems meet consistent quality and performance benchmarks, regardless of the project location or specific application. These standards provide a foundation for material selection, testing, installation, and quality control, helping to ensure the long-term success of composite geomembrane applications in hydraulic engineering (57).

7.2 Material Testing Standards and Methods

The performance of composite geomembranes in hydraulic engineering applications depends heavily on the quality of the materials used and their compliance with established standards. A comprehensive understanding of material testing standards and methods is essential for ensuring that composite geomembrane systems meet the required performance criteria (57).

Physical Property Testing:

Physical property testing is fundamental to evaluating the suitability of composite geomembranes for specific applications. Key physical properties and their testing methods include:

Thickness Measurement: The thickness of composite geomembranes is typically measured using a micrometer or caliper according to standards such as ASTM D5199. This parameter is critical for determining material uniformity and compliance with specifications (71).
Density Determination: The density of composite geomembrane materials is measured using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D1505. This property affects material buoyancy, thermal performance, and compatibility with other materials in the system (71).
Unit Weight Measurement: The unit weight (mass per unit area) of composite geomembranes is determined using methods specified in standards such as ISO 9864. This parameter is important for material handling, installation planning, and overall system design (57).
Water Absorption Testing: The water absorption capacity of composite geomembranes is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D570. This property is particularly important for applications where prolonged water exposure is expected (57).

These physical property tests provide essential baseline data for evaluating material quality and ensuring compliance with project specifications (57).

Mechanical Property Testing:

The mechanical properties of composite geomembranes are critical to their performance in hydraulic engineering applications. Key mechanical properties and their testing methods include:

Tensile Strength and Elongation: These properties are measured using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D6693 and ISO 10319. The tests involve clamping a specimen between grips and applying tension at a constant rate until failure, recording the maximum force (tensile strength) and the elongation at failure (71). For composite HDPE geomembranes, tensile strengths typically range between 17 MPa and 37 MPa, with elongation at break values of 450% to 700% or higher (71).
Puncture Resistance Testing: The puncture resistance of composite geomembranes is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D4833. This test measures the force required to push a 50mm diameter probe through the material at a specified rate. Puncture resistance values for composite geomembranes typically range between 160 N and 800 N, depending on the material and construction (71).
Tear Resistance Testing: The tear resistance of composite geomembranes is determined using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D1004. This test measures the force required to propagate a tear in the material. Tear resistance values for composite geomembranes typically range between 64 N and 311 N (71).
CBR Burst Strength Testing: The CBR (California Bearing Ratio) burst strength of composite geomembranes is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D6241. This test measures the force required to rupture the material using a 50mm diameter plunger. CBR burst strength values for composite geomembranes typically range between 1.1 kN and 3.2 kN (61).
Seam Strength Testing: The strength of seams and joints in composite geomembrane systems is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ISO 13438. This test measures the force required to separate or rupture a seam, which is critical for ensuring the integrity of the installed system (57).

These mechanical property tests provide valuable insights into how composite geomembranes will perform under various loading conditions encountered in hydraulic engineering applications (57).

Durability Testing:

The long-term durability of composite geomembranes is a critical consideration for hydraulic engineering applications. Key durability properties and their testing methods include:

Oxidation Induction Time (OIT): This parameter is measured using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D3895 and ASTM D5885. OIT testing measures the resistance of composite geomembranes to thermal oxidation by determining the time required for the material to begin oxidizing at an elevated temperature. For HDPE geomembranes, OIT values of at least 100 minutes (standard test) or 400 minutes (high-pressure test) are typically required (71).
Environmental Stress Crack Resistance (ESCR): This property is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D5397. ESCR testing measures the resistance of composite geomembranes to cracking under the combined effects of tensile stress and chemical exposure. For HDPE geomembranes, a minimum of 500 hours of exposure without cracking is typically required (71).
UV Resistance Testing: The resistance of composite geomembranes to ultraviolet radiation is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM G154. This testing involves exposing specimens to simulated sunlight and evaluating changes in mechanical properties over time (57).
Aging Resistance Testing: The resistance of composite geomembranes to aging is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D904. This testing involves exposing specimens to accelerated aging conditions (temperature, humidity, etc.) and evaluating changes in mechanical properties (57).
Chemical Resistance Testing: The resistance of composite geomembranes to specific chemicals is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D543. This testing involves exposing specimens to the chemical of interest under controlled conditions and evaluating changes in weight, dimensions, and mechanical properties (57).

These durability tests provide important information about how composite geomembranes will perform over their service life, helping engineers select materials that will withstand the specific environmental conditions of their projects (57).

Hydraulic Performance Testing:

The hydraulic performance of composite geomembranes is the primary consideration for seepage control applications. Key hydraulic properties and their testing methods include:

Permeability Testing: The permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of composite geomembranes is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D5084. This testing measures the rate at which water flows through the material under a specified hydraulic gradient. For HDPE composite geomembranes, permeability coefficients of 10⁻¹⁴ m/s or lower are typically achieved (58).
Hydrostatic Pressure Resistance Testing: The ability of composite geomembranes to withstand hydrostatic pressure is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D7171. This testing involves subjecting specimens to increasing water pressure until leakage occurs, determining the maximum pressure the material can withstand (57).
Seepage Control Efficiency Testing: The overall efficiency of composite geomembrane systems in controlling seepage is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D7007. This testing involves measuring the reduction in seepage achieved by the composite geomembrane system compared to an unlined condition (57).

These hydraulic performance tests are essential for ensuring that composite geomembrane systems meet the seepage control requirements of hydraulic engineering applications (57).

Installation-Related Testing:

The ease and effectiveness of installing composite geomembranes are important considerations for project success. Key installation-related properties and their testing methods include:

Weldability Testing: The ability of composite geomembranes to form effective welds is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D7397. This testing involves creating test welds under controlled conditions and evaluating their strength and integrity (57).
Handling Properties Evaluation: The ease of handling and installing composite geomembranes is evaluated through standardized procedures that consider factors such as weight, flexibility, and resistance to installation damage (57).
Anchorage System Testing: The performance of anchorage systems for composite geomembranes is evaluated using methods specified in standards such as ASTM D7172. This testing involves subjecting anchorage systems to simulated loading conditions and evaluating their performance (57).

These installation-related tests help ensure that composite geomembrane systems can be installed efficiently and effectively, with minimal risk of damage during construction (57).

By understanding and implementing these material testing standards and methods, engineers can ensure that the composite geomembrane systems they specify and install meet the highest standards of quality, performance, and durability. These tests provide the foundation for material selection, design decisions, and quality control throughout the project lifecycle, helping to ensure successful outcomes for hydraulic engineering applications (57).

7.3 Application-Specific Standards and Guidelines

Composite geomembrane applications in hydraulic engineering are governed by a range of application-specific standards and guidelines that address the unique requirements of different types of structures and environments. These standards provide valuable guidance for engineers designing and implementing composite geomembrane systems in specific contexts (57).

Reservoir and Dam Applications:

Reservoirs and dams represent major applications for composite geomembrane systems, with specific standards and guidelines addressing their unique requirements:

General Design Guidelines: Standards such as the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) guidelines provide recommendations for the use of geomembranes in dam construction and rehabilitation. These guidelines address material selection, design considerations, installation methods, and quality control (1).
Anchorage System Design: Specialized guidelines for anchorage system design in reservoir and dam applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D7172. These guidelines address the unique challenges of securing composite geomembranes on dam slopes and around appurtenances (1).
Wave Protection Requirements: Guidelines for wave protection in reservoir applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D7007. These guidelines address the selection and design of protective layers and anchorage systems to withstand wave action (1).
Underwater Installation Guidelines: Specialized guidelines for underwater installation of composite geomembranes in reservoir applications are emerging as this technology develops. The SIBELONMAT® system, which allows for underwater repairs of water supply canals, is helping to establish new standards and guidelines for this specialized application .

The Brandbach dam in Germany provides an example of how these standards and guidelines are applied in practice. After more than 75 years of operation, the concrete lining of this 16m-high dam needed to be sealed. The solution involved the installation of a drained geomembrane system, representing the first application of this technique in Germany. The project followed international guidelines for dam rehabilitation with composite geomembranes, ensuring compliance with safety and performance standards (7).

Canal Lining Applications:

Canal lining represents another important application area for composite geomembranes, with specific standards and guidelines addressing their use in this context:

Flow Enhancement Requirements: Standards such as ASTM D7007 include guidelines for evaluating the flow enhancement properties of composite geomembrane canal linings. These guidelines address the impact of different membrane surfaces (smooth vs. textured) on flow velocity and conveyance efficiency .
Erosion Protection Guidelines: Guidelines for erosion protection in canal applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D6449. These guidelines address the selection of protective layers and installation methods to prevent erosion damage to composite geomembrane linings .
Joint Design Requirements: Specialized guidelines for joint design in canal applications are provided in standards such as ISO 13438. These guidelines address the unique challenges of creating watertight joints in linear structures with varying cross-sections .
Underwater Repair Guidelines: The development of guidelines for underwater repair of canal linings is an emerging area. The SIBELONMAT® system, which allows for underwater repairs without reducing water flow, is helping to establish new standards and guidelines for this specialized application .

The Llangollen canal in North Wales, UK, provides an example of how these standards and guidelines are applied in practice. As part of the UK Waterways' ongoing improvement program for the UK canal network, a section of this 200-year-old canal required relining due to leakage. The solution involved the installation of a bituminous geomembrane system, which was selected in part because of its ability to bond directly to concrete. The project followed international guidelines for canal rehabilitation with composite geomembranes, ensuring compliance with both technical and heritage preservation standards (12).

Levee and Embankment Applications:

Levees and embankments represent another important application area for composite geomembranes, with specific standards and guidelines addressing their use in this context:

Settlement Adaptability Guidelines: Standards such as ASTM D7171 include guidelines for evaluating the ability of composite geomembranes to accommodate settlement in levee and embankment applications. These guidelines address material selection, design considerations, and installation methods that promote settlement adaptability (1).
Erosion Protection Requirements: Guidelines for erosion protection in levee and embankment applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D6449. These guidelines address the selection of protective layers and installation methods to prevent erosion damage to composite geomembrane systems (1).
Anchorage System Design: Specialized guidelines for anchorage system design in levee and embankment applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D7172. These guidelines address the unique challenges of securing composite geomembranes on embankment slopes and around appurtenances (1).

The use of composite geomembranes in levee and embankment applications is also guided by regional standards and guidelines. For example, in the USA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed guidelines for the use of geosynthetics in flood protection structures, which include recommendations for composite geomembrane systems (14).

Underwater and Wet Environment Applications:

The application of composite geomembranes in underwater and wet environments presents unique challenges that are addressed by specialized standards and guidelines:

Underwater Connection Methods: Guidelines for underwater connection methods are provided in standards such as ASTM D7171. These guidelines address the selection of appropriate connection techniques and materials for underwater applications .
Weighting System Design: Guidelines for designing weighting systems to keep composite geomembranes in place underwater are provided in standards such as ASTM D7007. These guidelines address the selection of appropriate weighting materials and methods for different water depths and flow conditions .
Remote Operation Guidelines: The development of guidelines for remote operation of composite geomembrane installation and inspection equipment is an emerging area. The use of remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) for underwater inspections and installations is helping to establish new standards and guidelines for this specialized application .

The development of the SIBELONMAT® system represents a significant advancement in underwater composite geomembrane applications. This technology allows for the repair of canals underwater without impacting operations, using panels of double geomembrane mattress filled with mortar and joined with watertight devices. The successful implementation of this technology in two pilot projects has helped establish new guidelines for underwater composite geomembrane applications .

Waste Containment Applications:

While not strictly hydraulic engineering applications, waste containment systems share many similarities with hydraulic structures and have influenced the development of composite geomembrane standards:

Double Liner Systems: Standards such as ASTM D7171 provide guidelines for the design and installation of double liner systems, which include both primary and secondary composite geomembrane layers with leak detection systems between them (10).
Leak Detection Requirements: Guidelines for leak detection systems in waste containment applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D7007. These guidelines address the design and installation of systems to detect even small leaks in composite geomembrane liners (10).
Chemical Resistance Requirements: Specialized guidelines for chemical resistance in waste containment applications are provided in standards such as ASTM D543. These guidelines address the selection of composite geomembrane materials that will withstand the specific chemical environments of different types of waste (10).

A case study involving the use of composite geomembranes in a copper-containing acidic liquid leakage project in China provides valuable insights into how these standards and guidelines are applied in practice. Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering & Technology, Inc. (BGE) successfully applied a composite cutoff wall consisting of HDPE geomembrane combined with soil-bentonite backfill. Specialized key sealing materials were developed to achieve effective bonding between the geomembrane and bedrock and clay aquifers. Additionally, a special machine for installing geomembranes was designed. The maximum geomembrane inserting depth on site reached 32 m, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach .

By following these application-specific standards and guidelines, engineers can ensure that their composite geomembrane systems are designed, installed, and maintained to meet the highest standards of performance and safety for their specific hydraulic engineering applications. These standards provide a framework for best practices, helping to ensure successful outcomes across a wide range of project types and conditions (57).

8. Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Key Findings and Conclusions

Based on the comprehensive analysis of composite geomembrane technology presented in this manual, several key findings and conclusions can be drawn regarding its application in hydraulic engineering (1).

Material Performance and Advantages:

Composite geomembranes have demonstrated exceptional performance in hydraulic engineering applications, offering several key advantages over traditional materials:

Superior Seepage Control: Composite geomembranes, particularly those made from HDPE, achieve near-impermeable conditions with permeability coefficients as low as 10⁻¹⁴ m/s or lower. This level of performance significantly exceeds that of traditional materials like concrete, which typically achieve permeabilities on the order of 10⁻⁷ m/s (58).
Excellent Deformation Adaptability: The flexibility and high elongation properties of composite geomembranes allow them to accommodate moderate settlements and deformations without compromising their integrity. This characteristic makes them particularly well-suited for areas prone to seismic activity or soil consolidation (29).
Enhanced Mechanical Properties: The combination of geomembrane material with geotextile reinforcement creates a composite structure with superior tensile strength, puncture resistance, and tear resistance compared to single-layer systems. For example, composite HDPE geomembranes can achieve tensile strengths of 20 MPa or higher, with puncture resistance values ranging from 160 N to 800 N (57).
Chemical and Environmental Resistance: Composite geomembranes offer excellent resistance to a wide range of chemicals and environmental conditions when properly selected. For example, PVC-based composite geomembranes have demonstrated good performance even after 18-31 years of service in challenging environments, despite significant plasticizer loss (4).
Long Service Life: Well-designed and properly installed composite geomembrane systems have demonstrated service lives ranging from 20 to 60 years, depending on material selection, installation quality, and environmental conditions. This longevity, combined with minimal maintenance requirements, makes them a cost-effective choice for many applications (51).

These material performance advantages position composite geomembranes as a leading choice for seepage control in modern hydraulic engineering applications (51).

Design and Application Considerations:

The successful application of composite geomembrane technology requires careful consideration of several key factors:

Anchorage System Design: The design of effective anchorage systems emerged as a critical factor in the success of composite geomembrane projects, particularly for structures with frequent water level fluctuations. Innovations in anchorage systems, such as heat-seaming the geomembrane to anchor bands embedded in vertical trenches, have proven particularly effective (1).
Material Selection: The choice of composite geomembrane material should be based on a thorough understanding of site-specific conditions, including temperature extremes, chemical exposure, UV radiation levels, and expected service life. For example, lacquered geomembranes have been developed specifically for high-UV environments like those found in parts of Morocco and the Middle East (1).
Joint and Seam Design: The design of joints and seams is critical to the overall performance of composite geomembrane systems. Heat welding techniques, when properly executed, can achieve joint efficiencies of 80% or higher, ensuring the integrity of the installed system (24).
Protection Layer Design: The design of protection layers is essential for ensuring the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems. These layers must be carefully selected to provide adequate protection from physical damage, UV radiation, and other environmental factors while maintaining system functionality (22).
Application-Specific Adaptations: Composite geomembrane technology has demonstrated remarkable adaptability to diverse application types, including reservoirs, dams, canals, levees, and even underwater environments. The development of specialized systems like the SIBELONMAT® underwater repair technology highlights the ongoing innovation in this field .

These design and application considerations emphasize the importance of taking a site-specific, application-driven approach to composite geomembrane system design (1).

Installation and Quality Control:

The successful installation of composite geomembrane systems requires careful attention to detail and rigorous quality control:

Base Preparation: Proper base preparation is essential for preventing punctures and ensuring the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems. This includes thorough removal of debris, grading to specified contours, and appropriate compaction (22).
Installation Techniques: The use of proper installation techniques, including careful handling of materials, precise positioning, and skilled welding, is critical to achieving optimal system performance. Specialized training for installation crews is strongly recommended (22).
Quality Control Protocols: Rigorous quality control protocols, including visual inspections, vacuum box testing, pressure testing, and electronic leak detection, are essential for ensuring the integrity of composite geomembrane installations. These protocols should be implemented at every stage of the project, from material delivery to final system testing (24).
Documentation: Comprehensive documentation of all aspects of the project, including material certifications, installation records, test results, and as-built drawings, is essential for ensuring accountability and facilitating future maintenance (24).
Long-Term Monitoring: The implementation of comprehensive long-term monitoring plans, including periodic inspections and, where appropriate, instrumentation for measuring system performance, is recommended to ensure early detection of any potential issues and to support ongoing system optimization (24).

These installation and quality control considerations underscore the importance of treating composite geomembrane system installation as a specialized construction activity requiring skilled personnel and rigorous quality management (22).

Cost and Environmental Considerations:

The evaluation of composite geomembrane technology must include consideration of both economic and environmental factors:

Cost-Effectiveness: Composite geomembrane systems typically offer significant cost advantages over traditional materials like concrete, with material and installation costs ranging between 30% to 50% of equivalent concrete systems. When considering life cycle costs over a 50-year period, these advantages become even more pronounced (51).
Resource Efficiency: Composite geomembrane systems require fewer raw materials and less energy for production compared to concrete, making them a more resource-efficient choice for many applications (51).
Carbon Footprint: The production of composite geomembranes generates significantly less carbon dioxide than concrete production, making them a more environmentally sustainable choice. Additionally, many composite geomembrane materials can be recycled at the end of their service life (51).
Water Conservation: The superior seepage control performance of composite geomembrane systems helps conserve water resources, which is particularly valuable in arid and semi-arid regions. This water conservation benefit can have significant environmental and economic value (51).

These cost and environmental considerations position composite geomembrane technology as a sustainable, economically attractive choice for many hydraulic engineering applications (51).

Technology Development and Innovation:

The field of composite geomembrane technology continues to evolve through ongoing research and innovation:

Material Development: Ongoing research into new materials and formulations is expanding the capabilities of composite geomembranes, including improvements in temperature resistance, chemical resistance, and UV stability. For example, new lacquered geomembrane formulations have been developed specifically for high-UV environments (1).
Installation Methodologies: Innovations in installation methodologies, such as the development of underwater repair technologies like the SIBELONMAT® system, are expanding the range of applications for composite geomembrane technology .
Anchorage System Innovation: Continued innovation in anchorage systems, including the development of heat-seamed connections to anchor bands, is improving the performance of composite geomembrane systems in challenging conditions (1).
Testing and Quality Control: Advances in testing methods and quality control techniques are improving the ability to evaluate and ensure the performance of composite geomembrane systems. These include new electronic leak detection technologies and more sophisticated methods for evaluating material durability (24).

These technology development and innovation trends suggest that composite geomembrane technology will continue to evolve and improve, further expanding its range of applications in hydraulic engineering (1).

8.2 Recommendations for Practice

Based on the comprehensive analysis presented in this manual, the following recommendations are provided for engineering professionals considering the use of composite geomembrane technology in hydraulic engineering applications (1).

Material Selection Recommendations:

The selection of appropriate composite geomembrane materials is critical to the long-term success of hydraulic engineering projects:

Conduct Thorough Material Evaluations: Before selecting a composite geomembrane material, conduct thorough evaluations of candidate products based on their physical properties, mechanical performance, durability characteristics, and compatibility with site-specific conditions. This evaluation should include a review of manufacturer certifications, independent test results, and performance data from similar applications (57).
Consider Hybrid Systems: In some cases, hybrid systems combining different types of composite geomembranes or combining composite geomembranes with other materials may provide the best solution. For example, combining HDPE composite geomembranes with soil-bentonite backfill has proven effective in cutoff wall applications .
Specify Material Performance, Not Just Product Names: When developing project specifications, focus on specifying required performance characteristics rather than simply naming specific products or manufacturers. This approach encourages competition and ensures that the selected materials will meet the project's specific needs (57).
Plan for Future Maintenance: When selecting composite geomembrane materials, consider their maintainability and repairability. Choose materials that can be easily inspected, repaired, and, if necessary, replaced without major disruption to the overall system (51).
Consider Recycled Content: Where appropriate, consider the use of composite geomembrane materials that incorporate recycled content. This not only supports sustainability goals but can also provide cost advantages while maintaining acceptable performance (51).

These material selection recommendations emphasize the importance of taking a systematic, application-specific approach to choosing composite geomembrane materials (57).

Design Recommendations:

The design of composite geomembrane systems should be based on sound engineering principles and consideration of project-specific requirements:

Incorporate Redundancy Where Appropriate: For critical applications, consider incorporating redundancy into the design, such as double liner systems with leak detection between layers. This approach provides an additional safety factor and allows for early detection of potential issues (10).
Pay Particular Attention to Anchorage Design: The design of anchorage systems is often a critical factor in the success of composite geomembrane installations. Consider innovative anchorage solutions, such as heat-seamed connections to anchor bands, particularly for applications with significant water level fluctuations or challenging site conditions (1).
Design for Deformation: Given the dynamic nature of many hydraulic structures, design composite geomembrane systems to accommodate expected deformations due to settlement, seismic activity, or thermal effects. This may include incorporating slack in the geomembrane, designing flexible connections, and selecting materials with appropriate elongation properties (29).
Integrate Monitoring Systems: Incorporate monitoring systems into the design to allow for ongoing evaluation of system performance. This may include instrumentation for measuring seepage, strain gauges for monitoring deformation, and 定期 inspection protocols (24).
Consider Aesthetic and Environmental Factors: In addition to functional requirements, consider aesthetic and environmental factors in the design of composite geomembrane systems. This may include selecting appropriate colors and textures for visible surfaces and incorporating vegetation or other elements to enhance the environmental integration of the structure (51).

These design recommendations emphasize the importance of taking a holistic approach to composite geomembrane system design, considering not just technical performance but also broader project goals and constraints (1).

Construction and Installation Recommendations:

The successful implementation of composite geomembrane systems requires careful planning and execution during construction:

Choose Experienced Contractors: Select contractors with demonstrated experience in composite geomembrane installation, particularly for applications similar to the project at hand. Request references and examples of past work to verify their capabilities (22).
Develop Detailed Construction Plans: Before beginning installation, develop detailed construction plans that address all aspects of the work, including material handling, installation sequences, quality control procedures, and safety protocols. These plans should be reviewed and approved by qualified professionals before implementation (22).
Invest in Training: Ensure that all personnel involved in the installation process receive appropriate training on the specific materials and methods to be used. This includes not only the installation crew but also quality control personnel and supervisors (22).
Implement Stringent Quality Control: Establish and enforce stringent quality control procedures throughout the installation process. This should include thorough inspections of materials upon delivery, ongoing monitoring of installation activities, and comprehensive testing of all seams and connections (24).
Document Everything: Maintain detailed records of all aspects of the installation, including material certifications, test results, daily work logs, and any issues encountered and resolved. This documentation is essential for ensuring accountability and facilitating future maintenance (24).

These construction and installation recommendations emphasize the importance of treating composite geomembrane installation as a specialized construction activity requiring careful planning and execution (22).

Quality Control and Assurance Recommendations:

Maintaining high standards of quality control and assurance is essential for ensuring the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems:

Develop Comprehensive Quality Plans: Before beginning work, develop comprehensive quality plans that outline the specific quality requirements for the project, the methods that will be used to verify compliance with these requirements, and the procedures for addressing any quality issues that may arise (24).
Conduct Independent Material Testing: To ensure the quality of delivered materials, consider conducting independent testing of representative samples. This testing should verify key properties such as tensile strength, puncture resistance, and permeability (24).
Implement a Three-Tier Inspection System: Establish a three-tier inspection system that includes self-inspection by installers, independent inspection by quality control personnel, and periodic third-party inspections. This approach provides multiple layers of quality assurance (24).
Use Advanced Testing Technologies: Take advantage of advanced testing technologies, such as electronic leak detection systems and more sophisticated methods for evaluating material durability. These technologies can provide more accurate and reliable data than traditional methods (24).
Establish Corrective Action Protocols: Develop clear protocols for addressing quality issues, including procedures for identifying and documenting problems, evaluating their significance, implementing corrective actions, and verifying the effectiveness of those actions (24).

These quality control and assurance recommendations emphasize the importance of proactive quality management throughout all phases of composite geomembrane system implementation (24).

Maintenance and Monitoring Recommendations:

Proper maintenance and monitoring are essential for ensuring the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems:

Develop Comprehensive Maintenance Plans: Before project completion, develop comprehensive maintenance plans that outline the specific maintenance activities required, their frequency, and the personnel responsible for performing them. These plans should be tailored to the specific characteristics of the installed system and site conditions (51).
Implement Regular Inspection Programs: Establish regular inspection programs that include both visual inspections and more detailed evaluations at appropriate intervals. These inspections should be conducted by qualified personnel who are familiar with composite geomembrane systems (51).
Establish Monitoring Protocols: Implement monitoring protocols to track key performance indicators over time. This may include measuring seepage rates, monitoring water levels, and evaluating the condition of protective layers and anchorage systems (24).
Develop Emergency Response Plans: Prepare emergency response plans that outline procedures for addressing potential issues such as leaks, punctures, or other forms of damage. These plans should include contact information, equipment needs, and step-by-step repair procedures (51).
Train Operations and Maintenance Personnel: Ensure that personnel responsible for operating and maintaining the system receive appropriate training on composite geomembrane systems. This training should cover inspection techniques, maintenance procedures, and basic repair methods (51).

These maintenance and monitoring recommendations emphasize the importance of ongoing care and attention to ensure the long-term performance of composite geomembrane systems (51).

Regulatory and Environmental Recommendations:

Compliance with relevant regulations and consideration of environmental impacts are important aspects of composite geomembrane system implementation:

Understand and Comply with Applicable Regulations: Before beginning work, thoroughly research and understand all applicable regulations related to composite geomembrane installations, including environmental regulations, building codes, and safety standards. Ensure that the project design and implementation fully comply with these requirements (57).
Conduct Environmental Impact Assessments: Before finalizing the project design, conduct thorough environmental impact assessments to identify potential environmental effects and develop appropriate mitigation measures. This includes assessing impacts on water quality, ecosystems, and cultural resources (22).
Implement Environmental Protection Measures: Implement appropriate measures to protect the environment during all phases of the project, including material storage, installation activities, and post-construction site restoration. This may include erosion control measures, pollution prevention plans, and habitat protection protocols (22).
Consider Life Cycle Environmental Impacts: When evaluating material options, consider the full life cycle environmental impacts of each alternative, including raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, installation, use, and end-of-life disposal or recycling. This life cycle assessment approach promotes more sustainable decision-making (51).
Promote Recycling and Waste Reduction: Implement strategies to minimize waste generation during construction and to promote recycling of both construction materials and, eventually, the composite geomembrane system itself. This includes specifying materials with high recycled content and designing systems that can be easily decommissioned and recycled at the end of their service life (51).

These regulatory and environmental recommendations emphasize the importance of considering broader environmental and regulatory factors in composite geomembrane system implementation (51).

8.3 Future Research Needs

While composite geomembrane technology has made significant advances in recent decades, several areas of research could further improve its performance and application in hydraulic engineering (1).

Material Development Research:

Ongoing research into new composite geomembrane materials and formulations is needed to address current limitations and expand application possibilities:

Enhanced Durability: Research is needed to develop composite geomembrane materials with enhanced resistance to environmental factors such as UV radiation, temperature extremes, and chemical exposure. This includes both improving existing materials and developing entirely new formulations (1).
Self-Healing Materials: Research into self-healing composite geomembrane materials represents an exciting frontier. These materials would have the ability to repair small punctures or cracks autonomously, extending service life and reducing maintenance needs (51).
Improved High-Temperature Performance: Research is needed to develop composite geomembrane materials that maintain their performance at higher temperatures, expanding their application possibilities in geothermal and industrial settings (58).
Enhanced Low-Temperature Flexibility: Further research into materials with enhanced low-temperature flexibility would improve the performance of composite geomembranes in cold climates and applications, reducing the risk of embrittlement and cracking (58).
Biodegradable Options: Research into biodegradable composite geomembrane materials could provide new options for temporary applications or applications where long-term containment is not required, reducing environmental impacts (51).

These material development research needs suggest that significant opportunities exist for improving composite geomembrane performance through innovative material science (1).

Design Methodology Research:

Research into improved design methodologies is needed to optimize the performance of composite geomembrane systems:

Advanced Modeling Techniques: Research into advanced modeling techniques, including finite element analysis and computational fluid dynamics, could improve the ability to predict the performance of composite geomembrane systems under various conditions. This includes modeling the interaction between the geomembrane and surrounding materials, as well as the effects of environmental factors (56).
Reliability-Based Design: Research into reliability-based design methodologies for composite geomembrane systems would provide a more rational basis for design decisions, incorporating uncertainties in material properties, loading conditions, and environmental factors (56).
Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Further research into life cycle cost analysis methodologies specific to composite geomembrane systems would help engineers make more informed decisions about material selection and system design. This includes developing more accurate models for predicting maintenance costs and service life (51).
Anchorage System Optimization: Research into optimizing anchorage systems for composite geomembrane applications is needed, particularly for challenging conditions such as high water level fluctuations, seismic activity, and extreme temperatures (1).
Joint and Seam Performance: Research into the long-term performance of composite geomembrane joints and seams is needed, including the development of improved testing methods and performance criteria (24).

These design methodology research needs suggest that significant opportunities exist for improving composite geomembrane system performance through better design approaches (1).

Installation and Construction Research:

Research into improved installation and construction methods is needed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of composite geomembrane implementations:

Automated Installation Techniques: Research into automated installation techniques, including robotic systems for welding and material handling, could improve installation efficiency and quality while reducing labor costs and safety risks (22).
Underwater Installation Methods: Further research into underwater installation methods, including the development of improved connection techniques and remotely operated equipment, would expand the application possibilities for composite geomembrane systems .
Cold Weather Installation Protocols: Research into optimizing composite geomembrane installation procedures for cold weather conditions is needed, including the development of specialized equipment and techniques (22).
High-Slope Installation Techniques: Research into improved techniques for installing composite geomembranes on steep slopes is needed, including the development of more effective anchorage systems and installation equipment (1).
Integrated Construction Methods: Research into integrated construction methods that combine composite geomembrane installation with other construction activities could improve project efficiency and reduce costs (22).

These installation and construction research needs suggest that significant opportunities exist for improving composite geomembrane system implementation through innovative construction methods (22).

Performance Evaluation Research:

Research into improved methods for evaluating the performance of composite geomembrane systems is needed to ensure their long-term effectiveness:

Long-Term Performance Monitoring: Research into long-term performance monitoring techniques, including both in-situ measurements and laboratory accelerated aging tests, is needed to better understand how composite geomembrane systems perform over time (24).
Non-Destructive Testing Advances: Research into advanced non-destructive testing techniques for evaluating composite geomembrane performance is needed, including the development of new technologies for detecting leaks, delaminations, and other defects (24).
Environmental Impact Assessment: Research into comprehensive methods for assessing the environmental impacts of composite geomembrane systems throughout their life cycle is needed, including both direct impacts and indirect effects (51).
Risk Assessment Methods: Research into improved risk assessment methods for composite geomembrane applications is needed, including the development of quantitative risk assessment frameworks that can be used to evaluate different design options (56).
Performance Prediction Models: Research into developing more accurate performance prediction models for composite geomembrane systems is needed, incorporating data from long-term monitoring studies and accelerated aging tests (24).

These performance evaluation research needs suggest that significant opportunities exist for improving the ability to evaluate and predict the performance of composite geomembrane systems (24).

Application Expansion Research:

Research into expanding the application of composite geomembrane technology to new areas is needed to fully realize its potential:

Urban Water Management: Research into the application of composite geomembrane technology in urban water management systems, including stormwater detention basins, green infrastructure, and wastewater treatment facilities, could provide new solutions for urban water challenges (51).
Coastal Applications: Research into the application of composite geomembrane technology in coastal environments, including shoreline protection, tidal barriers, and coastal aquaculture facilities, is needed to address the unique challenges of these environments (51).
Geothermal Applications: Research into the application of composite geomembrane technology in geothermal systems, including heat exchangers and reservoir liners, could provide new solutions for renewable energy development (51).
Nuclear Applications: Research into the application of composite geomembrane technology in nuclear facilities, including spent fuel storage and radioactive waste containment, is needed to address the unique challenges of these environments (51).
Space Applications: Research into the application of composite geomembrane technology in space exploration, including water storage and waste management systems for long-duration space missions, represents an exciting frontier (51).

These application expansion research needs suggest that composite geomembrane technology has significant untapped potential in a wide range of engineering disciplines beyond traditional hydraulic applications (51).

Standardization Research:

Research into improving and expanding composite geomembrane standards and testing methods is needed to ensure consistency and quality across applications:

International Standard Harmonization: Research into harmonizing composite geomembrane standards across different countries and regions is needed to facilitate international trade and improve the consistency of quality requirements (57).
Application-Specific Standards: Research into developing more comprehensive application-specific standards for composite geomembrane systems, including detailed guidance for challenging environments and specialized applications (57).
Testing Method Refinement: Research into refining existing testing methods and developing new ones is needed to better evaluate the performance of composite geomembrane materials and systems. This includes both material testing and system-level performance evaluation (60).
Performance-Based Specifications: Research into developing performance-based specifications for composite geomembrane systems is needed, moving away from prescriptive requirements toward outcome-oriented criteria (57).
Sustainability Standards: Research into developing sustainability standards and metrics for composite geomembrane systems is needed, including life cycle assessment criteria and environmental product declarations (51).

These standardization research needs suggest that significant opportunities exist for improving the consistency and quality of composite geomembrane systems through better standards and testing methods (57).

By addressing these research needs, the performance and application of composite geomembrane technology in hydraulic engineering can be further enhanced, providing even more effective and sustainable solutions for water resource management and protection (1).

参考资料

[1] Fulfilling pumped storage plants requirements with advanced geomembrane technology https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003440420-28/fulfilling-pumped-storage-plants-requirements-advanced-geomembrane-technology-vaschetti-scarella

[2] 西班牙在水利工程中使用合成土工膜的经验 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_civil-engineering_thesis/020417226509.html

[3] Lifetime Prediction of Modified Pvc-P Geomembranes Agedin Air https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4930165

[4] 西班牙东部水库中安装的增强型PVC-P土工膜的耐用性 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_geosynthetics-international-issn_thesis/020412184833.html

[5] Application of Carbon Fiber Materials in Water Conservancy Project https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aece-16/25870141

[6] Working behavior feedback of composite geomembranes based on seepage monitoring data https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Working-behavior-feedback-of-composite-geomembranes-Huang-Xie/5a575be21b270a210fe3c2bb2ad73755f4fe0281

[7] Braendbach：德国首次使用土工膜修复大坝 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_international-journal-hydropower-dams_thesis/020418343257.html

[8] A Review on Geomembrane Characteristics and Application in Geotechnical Engineering https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Review-on-Geomembrane-Characteristics-and-in-Shirazi-Valipourian/84546a7e2d9e573e7cf2e21acc1264bb53019a5e

[9] 西班牙水库防水中使用的合成土工膜的性能 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-conference-foreign_meeting-249767_thesis/070508592887.html

[10] Field Performance of Geomembrane and GCL at Two Mine Sites https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40515(291)6

[11] 土工膜将应对Shaver Lake大坝的渗漏。美国 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_international-journal-hydropower-dams_thesis/020418124669.html

[12] 用沥青土工膜衬砌英国的一条运河 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-conference-foreign_seventh-international-conference-geosynthetics-vol2-sep-22-27-2002_thesis/02051398946.html

[14] FURTHER MONITORING OF TWELVE GEOMEMBRANE SITES IN TEXAS https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/FURTHER-MONITORING-OF-TWELVE-GEOMEMBRANE-SITES-IN/7009b7a5965d5a09190a86a03f72382d9eacb360

[15] OVERESTIMATION OF BENEFITS OF CANAL IRRIGATION PROJECTS: DECLINE OF PERFORMANCE OVER TIME CAUSED BY DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE CANAL LINING^{†} https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ird.2341

[16] 摩洛哥王国防水木筏中的合成聚合物土工膜 https://m.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-foreign_civil-engineering_thesis/020417221458.html

[17] What is a Composite Geomembrane? https://www.earthshields.com/what-is-a-composite-geomembrane/

[18] Composite Geomembrane http://www.linkedin.com/pulse/composite-geomembrane-alex-qu

[19] Composite Geomembrane | Waterproof Geotextile Fabric • QIVOC https://qivoc.com/product/composite-geomembrane/

[20] Composite Materials | ASTM https://www.astm.org/news/composite-materials-nd23

[21] ASTM D3039 - Composite Tensile Testing https://www.universalgripco.com/astm-d3039

[22] 复合土工膜施工_百科 https://m.baike.com/wiki/%E5%A4%8D%E5%90%88%E5%9C%9F%E5%B7%A5%E8%86%9C%E6%96%BD%E5%B7%A5/5568027?baike_source=doubao

[23] 复合土工膜防渗土工布的施工方法 - 产品库 - 九正建材网手机版 https://m.jc001.cn/goods/5909712.html

[24] 600g复合土工膜的施工规范-土工膜-列表网 http://m.liebiao.com/b2b/jiazhuangjc/383961811.html

[25] 复合土工膜的施工方法_进行_验收_焊接 https://m.sohu.com/a/525055986_120847986/

[26] 复合土工膜防渗施工工艺原理及施工工艺流程中英文翻译-金锄头文库 https://m.jinchutou.com/shtml/view-407260843.html

[27] 复合土工膜施工工艺-20230607140119.pdf-原创力文档 https://m.book118.com/html/2023/0607/7066004165005115.shtm

[28] 复合土工膜施工流程及方法.pdf-原创力文档 https://m.book118.com/html/2022/0205/5144332100004141.shtm

[29] Which is better, geomembrane or concrete? - tinhygeosynthetics.com https://tinhygeosynthetics.com/blog-news/which-is-better-geomembrane-or-concrete/

[30] Vertical Impermeable Barriers (Cutoff Walls) | Geoengineer.org https://mail.geoengineer.org/education/web-class-projects/cee-549-geoenvironmental-engineering-winter-2013/assignments/impermeable-barriers

[31] Geomembrane Cutoff Wall Installation Utilizing a Narrow Trench Technique https://www.xrgeomembranes.com/project-profiles/geomembrane-cutoff-wall-installation

[32] Differences of Geomembrane vs Geocell - BPM Geosynthetics https://www.bpmgeosynthetics.com/differences-of-geomembrane-vs-geocell/

[33] The compatibility of bentonite/sepiolite plastic concrete cut-off wall material | Request PDF https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308354053_The_compatibility_of_bentonitesepiolite_plastic_concrete_cut-off_wall_material

[34] 土工合成材料论文.doc-金锄头文库 https://m.jinchutou.com/shtml/view-543919706.html

[35] 渠道防渗抗冻新材料与新技术(pdf) http://www.jsgg.com.cn/Files/PictureDocument/20100630173218361508835528.pdf

[36] 复合土工薄膜及其防渗设计(pdf) http://www.cgejournal.com/cn/article/pdf/preview/9655.pdf

[37] 复合土工膜在引黄闸防渗中的应用(pdf) http://www.rmhh.com.cn/qklb/2019/201901/201902/P020190226409805926242.pdf

[38] 土石坝复合土工膜防渗技术应用探讨(pdf) http://www.scslfd.com/webapp/accessory/ueditor/upload/file/20191031/1572502828245085189.pdf

[39] 仁宗海水电站坝面复合土工膜防渗堆石坝设计 https://jour.hhu.edu.cn/slsdkjjz/article/abstract/jz2009s151?st=search

[40] 长江三峡二期围堰土工膜防渗结构前期研究 https://jour.hhu.edu.cn/hhdxxbzr/article/abstract/xb19970513

[41] BS EN 13707 - Flexible sheets for waterproofing. Reinforced bitumen sheets for roof waterproofing. Definitions and characteristics https://landingpage.bsigroup.com/LandingPage/Undated?UPI=000000000030178020

[42] EVS-EN 13707:2013 - EVS standard evs.ee | en https://www.evs.ee/en/evs-en-13707-2013

[43] NEN-EN 13707:2013 en https://www.nen.nl/en/nen-en-13707-2013-en-188253

[44] ASTM D6751-20 - Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astmd675120

[45] ASTM D6751 Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels – SPL https://spllabs.com/fuels-lubricants-tests/astm-d6751-standard-specification-for-biodiesel-fuel-blend-stock-b100-for-middle-distillate-fuels/

[46] Composite Geomembrane for pond liners China Manufacturer_China Supplier_China Factory- Shandong Luke Composite Co., Ltd https://www.cnsdluke.com/composite/composite-0.html

[47] Numerical Simulation of Impermeability of Composite Geomembrane in Rigid Landfills https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/6/3/65

[48] 2025 HX-Composite Geomembrane - Dezhou Huaxiang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. - Page 1 https://m.made-in-china.com/company-geomembrane-factory/productlist/group/1637158622

[49] Compound Geomembrane Price - Buy Cheap Compound Geomembrane At Low Price On Made-in-China.com https://www.made-in-china.com/price/compound-geomembrane-price_11.html

[50] 复合土工薄膜及其防渗设计(pdf) http://cge.nhri.cn/cn/article/pdf/preview/9655.pdf

[51] 蓄水池用土工膜比用水泥好吗_防渗_混凝土_施工 https://m.sohu.com/a/870769975_120006768/

[52] 垃圾填埋场土工膜防渗系统的比较与探讨-行业动态-德州正宇土工材料有限公司-短丝土工布,HDPE土工膜,长丝复合土工膜,覆膜膨润土防水毯,三维复合排网 http://www.dzzy8.cn/?list_4/222.html

[53] 复合土工膜在荆隆宫截渗墙工程中的应用(pdf) http://www.rmhh.com.cn/qklb/2002/200207/201901/P020190201389394669503.pdf

[54] 希尼尔水库坝基防渗墙抗溶蚀耐久性试验研究(pdf) http://www.rmhh.com.cn/qklb/2009/200906/201901/P020190201594653546562.pdf

[55] 平原水库土工膜防渗和混凝土预制板护坡研究(pdf) http://www.rmhh.com.cn/qklb/2000/200006/201901/P020190131646993441904.pdf

[56] 复合土工膜防渗堆石坝变形性状分析及材料选型研究 - 道客巴巴 https://m.doc88.com/p-0496183176671.html

[57] ASTM Standard HDPE Geomembrane Sheet / Composite HDPE ASTM Standard Geomembrane Sheet for Landfill - Buy Geomembranes from suppliers, Manufacturers - Okorder.com https://m.okorder.com/p/composite-hdpe-astm-standard-geomembrane-hdpe-geomembrane-astm-standard-geomembrane-for-landfill_905095.html

[58] The Complete Guide to HDPE Geomembrane Liners https://geomembranemurah.com/the-complete-guide-to-hdpe-geomembrane-liners/

[59] Composite Geomembrane - Dawnview Geosynthetics https://dawnviewgeo.com/geomembrane/composite-geomembrane/

[60] Geotechnical Engineering Standards - Standards Products - Standards & Publications - Products & Services https://www.astm.org/products-services/standards-and-publications/standards/geotechnical-engineering-standards.html

[61] China Nonwoven Geotextile Geomembrane Manufacturers, Suppliers, Factory - LIANYI https://www.chinageogridgeotextile.com/composite-geomembrane/nonwoven-staple-filament-geotextile-comp.html

[62] 防渗墙(欧洲规范).doc -原创力文档 https://m.book118.com/html/2017/0907/132479760.shtm

[63] 混凝土防渗墙[水工建筑物的防渗透措施之一]_百科 https://m.baike.com/wiki/%E6%B7%B7%E5%87%9D%E5%9C%9F%E9%98%B2%E6%B8%97%E5%A2%99/488279?baike_source=doubao

[64] 水库大坝混凝土防渗墙施工技术探讨 - 道客巴巴 https://m.doc88.com/p-7116286003025.html

[65] 黏土混凝土防渗墙检测技术研究及应用(pdf) http://www.scslfd.com/webapp/accessory/ueditor/upload/file/20191230/1577762442433095764.pdf

[66] 水工建筑物知识普及防渗墙施工-抖音 https://www.iesdouyin.com/share/video/7242184113879256332/?did=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&from_aid=1128&from_ssr=1&iid=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&mid=7242184179142953786&region=&scene_from=dy_open_search_video&share_sign=hwXsx_S5jMmM2dlnE_vVqcyJwzVZSXiWdupcOAP2y7o-&share_version=280700&titleType=title&ts=1752546161&u_code=0&video_share_track_ver=&with_sec_did=1

[67] #混凝土 #膨润土 #防渗墙 #施工现场实拍 #水利工程-抖音 https://www.iesdouyin.com/share/video/7367156624676457779/?did=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&from_aid=1128&from_ssr=1&iid=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&mid=7367156691948899091&region=&scene_from=dy_open_search_video&share_sign=dBKjKLAGo7pqY8I7tS566SD4xoR6Tg4Fx_K2jqG8toQ-&share_version=280700&titleType=title&ts=1752546187&u_code=0&video_share_track_ver=&with_sec_did=1

[68] 【一建水利】3D动画~水手.5 砼防渗墙（完整版&私♥呦）备考25年一级建造师，学习没有捷径-抖音 https://www.iesdouyin.com/share/video/7434409131433299251/?did=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&from_aid=1128&from_ssr=1&iid=MS4wLjABAAAANwkJuWIRFOzg5uCpDRpMj4OX-QryoDgn-yYlXQnRwQQ&mid=7434407982873725736&region=&scene_from=dy_open_search_video&share_sign=jY8L3.ebr4s_V3nB0sFSxrCeT69AOoV0E4KCoVRFYvs-&share_version=280700&titleType=title&ts=1752546161&u_code=0&video_share_track_ver=&with_sec_did=1

[69] Comparação de preços de atacado 2025 Nova Geomembrana de Alta Qualidade Especialmente Projetada para Mineração Durável e Confiável https://pt.made-in-china.com/video-channel/chinageosynthetics_aOpGWujvEbfF_2025-New-High-Quality-Geomembrane-Specially-Designed-for-Mining-Durable-and-Reliable.html

[70] HDPE Geomembrane https://studylib.es/doc/5963491/hdpe-geomembrane

[71] Geomembrane en HDPE standard ASTM avec géotextile à deux côtés - Chine Géomembrane, HDPE https://fr.made-in-china.com/amp/co_geomembrane/product_ASTM-Standard-HDPE-Geomembrane-with-Two-Side-Geotextile_uoiyhnnnyu.html

[72] Geomembranes/Techn. Sheet/S https://studylib.es/doc/7484127/geomembranes-techn.-sheet-s

[73] 0.3mm 0.5mm 0.75mm 1.0mm 1.25mm 1.5mm 2.0mm 3.0mm Customized HDPE/LDPE/LLDPE/PVC Textured Smooth Surface Geomembrane Liner Sheet for Building Material - Customized Length Geomembrane, Building Material Geomembrane | Made-in-China.com https://m.made-in-china.com/product/0-3mm-0-5mm-0-75mm-1-0mm-1-25mm-1-5mm-2-0mm-3-0mm-Customized-HDPE-LDPE-LLDPE-PVC-Textured-Smooth-Surface-Geomembrane-Liner-Sheet-for-Building-Material-1940234071.html

[74] 2025 Composite Drainage Net - Shandong Jinruixiang Geotextile Material Co., Ltd. - Page 1 https://m.made-in-china.com/company-geomembranechina/productlist/group/1631374715

[75] China Composite Geotextile Membrane Water, Composite Geotextile Membrane Water Wholesale, Manufacturers, Price | Made-in-China.com https://www.made-in-china.com/products-search/hot-china-products/Composite_Geotextile_Membrane_Water.html

[76] Composite Geomembrane Hdpe Price - Buy Cheap Composite Geomembrane Hdpe At Low Price On Made-in-China.com https://www.made-in-china.com/price/composite-geomembrane-hdpe-price_7.html

THE END

Asphalt Concrete Facing Technology for Seepage Control in Hydraulic Engineering: A Comprehensive Technical Guide

Clay Core Wall Seepage Control Technology in Hydraulic Engineering

Next article>>